تحلیل بلاغی زبان لوطیها در فیلمنامههای علی حاتمی | ||
| پژوهش های دستوری و بلاغی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 28، دی 1404، صفحه 202-216 اصل مقاله (1.68 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: بلاغی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jls.2026.14622.1756 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مجید هوشنگی* 1؛ رضوان مبینی2؛ مرضیه حسنی2 | ||
| 1استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در نگرشهای ساختاری به آثار ادبی، اصل تناسب فرم و محتوا و ایجاد ارتباط میان اثر، موقعیت و مخاطب مورد توجه قرار میگیـرد و هر کـاربست بلاغـی به صـورت مستقیم با جـایگاه و مــوقعیت متــن و مخـاطب مرتبط است. بـه عبـارتی برجستهسازیهای اثر هنری، اگر فراتر از بافت و موقعیت و یا فروتر از آن باشد، به امری غیر ساختاری و یا نازیبا تعبیر خواهد شد. علی حاتمی در آثار خود، سعی در بازآفرینی فضا و بافت زبان جاری در متون ادبی دورة قاجار را داشته است؛ اما روند افراطی و غیر ساختارمند او در کاربست صنایع بلاغی در دیالوگهای شخصیتها، این ظرفیت را به یک امر ضد ارزش در ساختار زیباییشناسانه بدل کرده است. لذا این پژوهش سعی دارد تا با استخراج و بررسی زبان لوطیهای فیلمنامههای علی حاتمی، با روشی توصیفی - آماری به تحلیلی انتقادی این رویکرد بپردازد. نتایج پژوهش نشان میدهد که علیرغم تلاش حاتمی در کاربست زبان برجسته برای این تیپ شخصیتی جهت بالا بردن ارزش ادبی متن خود، عملاَ این فرایند به یک ضد ارزش در آثار او تبدیل شده و ادبیت جاری در دیالوگهای جاهلانة او، موجب فاصله گرفتن اثر از مخاطب و بافت تاریخی و واقعیت جامعه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نقد بلاغی؛ زبان لوتیها؛ علی حاتمی؛ مادر؛ هزاردستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Rhetorical Criticism of the Luti Language in Ali Hatami’s Screenplays | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| majid houshangi1؛ Rezvan mobini2؛ marziyeh hasani2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature , Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Master's student in Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In structural approaches to literary works, the principle of harmony between form and content, along with establishing connections among the work, its context, and the audience, is emphasized, and each rhetorical device is directly examined in relation to the text's position and the audience's context. This means that the foregrounding in an artistic work, if it exceeds or falls short of the context and situation, will be interpreted as non-structural or aesthetically deficient. On the other hand, Ali Hatami, as the author, has focused on the literariness of the text, striving to recreate the space and texture of literariness prevalent in Qajar-era texts, and seeks to imbue his work with an aspect beyond that of a mere film composed of visual units. However, the issue is that his excessive and unstructured use of rhetorical devices in character dialogues turns this potential into a negative aesthetic factor. Therefore, this study seeks to analyze the literariness embedded in the language of the luti characters in Ali Hatami’s screenplays, employing a descriptive-statistical method. The findings briefly reveal that, contrary to Hatami’s efforts to enhance the literary value of his texts through the use of elevated language for these character types, this approach has in fact become a counterproductive element. The ostentatious dialogues of his jāhel characters have resulted in distancing the work from its audience, historical context, and social reality. Introduction Ali Hatami's cinema stands apart from its historical precedents and contemporary counterparts, with a significant portion of this distinction rooted in his narrative approach, which diverges from the conventional cinematic traditions in Iran. His distinctive affinity for employing the expressive style of the Qajar era alongside the vernacular of the streets and bazaars from the early Pahlavi period, combined with his unique typification and character development, imbues his works with a particular poetic and nostalgic quality, ultimately forging a specialized linguistic idiom. The application of language in narrative works, particularly through dialogue, serves to reveal the author's mindset and intentions. Hatami's language in his screenplays is historical, evocative of the Qajar period. The Qajar era, marked by profound social, political, and cultural transformations, exhibits unique linguistic and literary characteristics that Hatami vividly captures. However, this emphasis on the ornate, literary language of the Qajar period has advanced to such an extent that the characters in his narratives speak in an unparalleled manner, creating a certain distance from the audience. Thus, this study aims to examine the relationship between the rhetorical elements employed in the luti (chivalrous) characters of Hatami's works and their audience. Materials & Methods Rhetorical criticism represents one of the longstanding movements in literary analysis, encompassing the examination of expressive and stylistic features in literary works, such as the study of classical texts and authors through traditional literary critical lenses. A key feature of literary criticism involves rhetorical analysis based on expressive and stylistic attributes, which evolved with the advent of modern applied rhetoric theories into what is termed rhetorical criticism. This approach entails referencing literary works to assess their capacities for foregrounding and norm-breaking at the linguistic level, tailored to each language's potentials. Dramatic texts, as primary targets, strive to transcend the familiar boundaries of language through literariness and linguistic prominence, where the application of literary devices emerges as one of the most effective methods. Consequently, rhetorical analysis constitutes a primary priority in dissecting dramatic texts or screenplays, illuminating how the author's perspective manifests post-performance in dialogues and monologues (the discursive dimension of the text) and signaling the nature of their central communicative act. Research findings In the film Madar (Mother), Ali Hatami embodies the archetype of luti chivalry and gallantry through the character of Mohammad Ebrahim, while in the series Hezar Dastan (Thousand Hands), he centers on Shaban Estekhoni, highlighting two facets of this persona. In both dimensions, linguistic play, hyperbole in simile accumulation, the creation and deployment of metaphors, allusions, and other literary devices overshadow the conveyance of meaning and message in dialogues, often to the point where general audiences struggle to comprehend certain lines. This privileging of rhetorical form over semantic content becomes so pronounced that even specialized viewers, particularly the educated elite, falter in grasping nuances, requiring research or deep investigation into sources for textual understanding. This phenomenon contravenes the principle of structural coherence and alignment between part and whole, thereby revealing a systemic inconsistency in Hatami's compositional framework. Following the identification of these elements in both works, their defamiliarization at linguistic levels is delineated, culminating in statistical validation of this hypothesis within the textual corpus. Hatami employs allusions in luti dialogues—exploiting polysemy and both semantic layers—predominantly of the implicative type, which are not overly obscure. In both directing and dialogue writing, he leverages simile so innovatively that precise statistical scrutiny reveals its dominance over visual imagery and dramatic action. The metaphors that emerge prominently gravitate toward honorific titles, invectives, and the like. Based on documented extractions from the two works, expressive devices in luti and jahel (underworld tough) speech prioritize stylistic flourishes over mere rhetoric, elevating the text from plain prose to technically ornate prose, akin to the writings of literati like Qa'em Maqam's Munsha'at. This shift undermines the overarching dialogic structure, as thinker Mikhail Bakhtin posits the word in dialogue as a bidirectional act interfacing simultaneously with the word itself and the listener, forging reciprocal dynamics where words orchestrate the exchange. In novels, conversational essence manifests as stylistic prose; poetic essence aligns with monologue, where the poet pursues totalizing monologism. Here, Hatami's poetic dimension concretely asserts itself, propelling his work from prose toward poetry. Thus, the monologic and univocal thrust of his writing intensifies, severing ties with audiences at the highest levels. Discussion of Results & Conclusion Analysis of Hatami's texts raises a critical question: the ratio of literary language and formal foregrounding to character typology, its requisites, audience positioning, and auditory encounter fails to demonstrate proper parallelism and adequacy, particularly in the recurrent luti and jahel vernacular. Audience expectations, textual context, historical fabric, and narrative realism in Hatami's oeuvre demand such alignment for luti characters and their speech. Data and derived statistics confirm that the jahel archetype across both works utilizes rhetorical devices at expressive and stylistic levels in 198 of 333 sentences. In essence, the language-character relationship in these seminal Hatami texts emerges as disproportionate and habit-driven. Through this imbalance, Hatami fails to technically differentiate the jahel from literati, artists, teachers, and others—a structural flaw in screenwriting and narration. Ultimately, Hatami's prioritization of "Saadi of Iranian cinema" status insulated him from direct realism, character exigencies, and broad audience engagement. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Rhetorical criticism, language of the luti, dialogue, Ali Hatami, Mother, Hezar Dastan | ||
| مراجع | ||
منابعایرجی، نرگس؛ مهربان قزلحصار، جواد و تقوی بهبهانی، مجید. (1402). «بررسی ساختار زبانی سریال هزاردستان علی حاتمی». زیباییشناسی ادبی. شمارة 55. صص: 267-249.
باباسالار، علی اصغر؛ مؤذنی، علی محمد و کدخدایی، خدیجه. (1400). «بررسی وجوه آشناییزدایی موسیقایی در سرودههای کودکانه محمود کیانوش». پژوهشهای دستوری و بلاغی. شمارة 20. صص: 286-263.
باقری، فارس. (1392). کارکرد و کاربرد زبان در فرایند نمایشنامهنویسی. تهران: نشر افراز.
تامسون، کریستین. (1377). «نظریههای انتقادی، روش نئوفرمالیستی در نقد ادبی». ترجمة محمد گذرآبادی. فارابی. شمارة 31. صص: 145-114.
ثروتیان، بهروز. (1378). بیان در شعر فارسی. تهران: انتشارات برگ.
خلعتبری، مصطفی. (1386). «فولکلور و سینما: مروری بر آثار سینمایی زنده یاد علی حاتمی از منظر فرهنگ عامه». فرهنگ مردم بهار و تابستان. شمارة 21 و 22. صص: 83-72.
حاتمی، علی. (1376). مجموعه آثار علی حاتمی. ج2. تهران: مرکز.
حسینی، سید حسن. (1388). مشت در نمای درشت. تهران: سروش.
حیاتی، زهرا. (1391). «مقایسة استعارة ادبی و استعارة سینمایی با شواهدی از شعر فارسی». پژوهشهای ادبی. شمارة 38. صص: 58ـ35.
دولتشاه سمرقندی. (1382). تذکره الشعرا. تهران: اساطیر.
دیوان بیگی شیرازی، سید احمد. (1364). حدیقه الشعرا. تهران: زرین.
رضایی، احمد. (1389). «بررسی و تحلیل جایگاه مخاطب در عصر سامانی با تأکید بر اشعار رودکی و مقایسه آن با ادوار شعر فارسی». پژوهشهای دستوری و بلاغی. شمارة 5. صص: 26-7.
زرینکوب، عبدالحسین. (1356). شعر بی دروغ، شعر بینقاب. تهران: انتشارات علمی.
صادقی، مهدی. (1393). حاتمی در امتداد فردوسی. تهران: نشر رسم.
صفری سرنجه، پروین، حسنی جلیلیان، محمدرضا و زهرهوند، سعید. (۱۳۹۸). «روایت نوستالژیک علی حاتمی». مطالعات ادبیات روایی. شمارة ۲. صص: 85-64.
عشقی، بهزاد. (۱۳۷۵). «شبح قاجار و سینمای حاتمی». هنر و معماری، نقد سینما. شمارة 7. صص: 172-168.
عوفی، محمد. (1335). لباب الالباب. به کوشش سعید نفیسی. تهران: ابن سینا.
فتوحی رودمعجنی، محمود. (1385). نقد ادبی در سبک هندی. تهران: سخن.
کزازی، میر جلالالدّین. (1372). زیباشناسی سخن پارسی (بیان). تهران: مرکز.
همایی، جلالالدّین. (1373). فنون بلاغت و صناعات ادبی. تهران: نشر هما.
یحیایی، محمد؛ پوراخلاص، شکرالله و ظهیری، بیژن. (1398) «وجوه ادبیت در فیلم مادر علی حاتمی». فصلنامة پژوهشهای ادبیات تطبیقی. شمارة 3. صص: 85-59.
Baldick, C. (2008). The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms [Online]. Oxford University Press.
ReferencesBabasalar, A.A., Moudani, A.M & Kadkhodaei, Kh. (2021). Examining Musical Defamiliarization Aspects in Mahmoud Kianush's Children's Poems. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Dasturi va Balaghi (Syntax and Rhetoric Research), 20, 263-286. [In Persian]
Bagheri, F. (2013). Language Function and Usage in Playwriting Process. Tehran: Afraz Publishing. [In Persian]
Baldick, C. (2008). The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. [Online]. Oxford University Press.
Divan Bigi Shirazi, S.A. (1985). Hadigheh al-Sho'ara. ed. Abdolhossein Navaei. Tehran: Zarrin. [In Persian]
Dowlatshah Samarqandi. (2003). Tazkereh al-Sho'ara. ed. Edward Browne. Tehran: Asatir. [In Persian]
Fotuhi Rudmoajeni, M. (2006). Literary Criticism in the Indian Style. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
Hatami, A. (1997). Collected Works of Ali Hatami. vol. 2. Tehran: Markaz Publishing. [In Persian]
Hayati, Z. (2012). Comparing Literary and Cinematic Metaphors with Evidence from Persian Poetry. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Adabi (Literary Research), 38, 35-58. [In Persian]
Hosseini, S.H. (2009). Fist in Close-Up. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Homai, J. (1994). Techniques of Rhetoric and Literary Devices. Tehran: Homa Publishing. [In Persian]
Iraji, N., Mehraban Ghazalhesar, J & Taghavi Behbahani, M. (2023). Examining the Linguistic Structure of Ali Hatami's Hazar Dastan Series. Badi'ashenasi-ye Adabi (Literary Aesthetics), 55, 249-267. [In Persian]
Kazazi, J. (1993). Aesthetics of Persian Speech (Expression). Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
Khaleqtari, M. (2007). Folklore and Cinema: A Review of the Late Ali Hatami's Films from the Perspective of Popular Culture. Farhang-e Mardom (Popular Culture), 21 & 22, 72-83. [In Persian]
Eshghi, B. (1996). Specter of Qajar and Hatami's Cinema. Honar va Memari (Art and Architecture), Cinema Criticism, 7,168-172. [In Persian]
Owfi, M. (1956). Lobab al-Albab. ed. Saeid Nafisi. Tehran: Ibn Sina. [In Persian]
Rezaei, A. (2010). Examining and Analyzing the Role of Audience in the Samanid Era with Emphasis on Rudaki's Poems and Comparison with Persian Poetry Periods. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Dasturi va Balaghi (Syntax and Rhetoric Research), 5, 7-26. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, M. (2014). Hatami in the Lineage of Ferdowsi. Tehran: Rasam Publishing. [In Persian]
Safari Sarnjeh, P., Hasani Jalilian, M & Zahrevand, S. (2019). Nostalgic Narration of Ali Hatami. Motalaat-e Adabiyat-e Ravayi (Narrative Literature Studies), 2, 64-85. [In Persian]
Sarvatian, B. (1999). Expression in Persian Poetry. Tehran: Barge Publications. [In Persian]
Thomson, K. (1998). Critical Theories: Neoformalist Method in Literary Criticism. trans. Mohammad Gozarabadi. Farabi, 31, 114-145. [In Persian]
Yahyai, M., Pouralakhase, sh and Zehiri,B. (2019). Literary Aspects in Ali Hatami's Mother Film. Faslnam-e Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Adabiyat-e Ttbiqi (Comparative Literature Research Quarterly), 3, 59-85. [In Persian]
Zarrinkoub, A. (1977). Poetry without Lies, Poetry without Masks. Tehran: Elmi Publications. [In Persian]
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 173 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71 |
||