بررسی عیوب فصاحت و بلاغت در دیوان ابوالقاسم لاهوتی | ||
| پژوهش های دستوری و بلاغی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 27، تیر 1404، صفحه 181-204 اصل مقاله (1.42 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: بلاغی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jls.2025.12495.1680 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علی سلیمانی* | ||
| استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مردمی شدن ادبیات، مخاطبین عوام و سخن گفتن دربارة وقایع سیاسی و اجتماعی روزگار، باعث شد تا شاعران دورة مشروطه از زبان روزمره استفاده و چندان بر عناصر شعری توجه نکنند و در نتیجه رشد ادبی خاصی نیز اتفاق نیفتد. منتقدان بر این نکته اذعان دارند که شعر مشروطه علیرغم داشتن مضامین نو و تلاش شاعران برای تجدد ادبی، بواسطة عوامانه بودن، عیوب و اغلاطی دارد و شاعران این عهد، چندان بر صحیح بودن کلام و ساختارهای طبیعی زبان فارسی تسلط ندارند. ابوالقاسم لاهوتی از جمله شاعرانی است که با وجود پیشگام بودن در شعر نو، چندان از این نقیصه به دور نمانده و در اشعار وی عیوبی را میتوان دید که فصاحت و بلاغت اشعار وی را خدشهدار کرده است. از رهرو پژوهش حاضر که به شیوة تحلیلی-توصیفی انجام شده، میتوان دریافت که لاهوتی در دو حیطه کلمه و کلام ضعیف است. استفاده از کلمات غریبِ زبانهای روسی، تاجیکی، فرانسوی و... که تنافر حروف و کراهیت در سمع را نیز در پی دارد، استفاده از علایم اختصاری و سر واژهسازی با عبارات غیرقابل فهم برای مخاطبان، وجود اغلاط املائی و غیره نشانگر ضعف لاهوتی در حیطه کلمه است. عیوب حیطة کلام لاهوتی نیز گرچه به اندازة عیوب کلمه وی نیست اما با این حال در اشعار او عیوبی چون: تنافر کلمات، ضعف تألیف و تعقید لفظی و معنوی نیز دیده میشود. تمامی این عیوب نشان از درستی نظر منتقدان در خصوص فصیح و بلیغ نبودن شاعران مشروطه دارد و لاهوتی نیز جزو این شاعران است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ابوالقاسم لاهوتی؛ شعر مشروطه؛ نقد بلاغی؛ فصاحت و بلاغت؛ عیوب کلمه؛ عیوب کلام | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Examining the Deficiencies of Eloquence and Rhetoric in the Divan of Abolqasem Lahouti | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Soleimani | ||
| Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The popularization of literature, the expansion of its audience to the general public, and the focus on contemporary political and social events led poets of the Constitutional period to employ colloquial language with limited attention to poetic elements, resulting in the absence of substantial literary advancement. Critics have acknowledged that despite the introduction of new themes and poets’ efforts toward literary modernization, Constitutional poetry, owing to its colloquial nature, contains defects and inaccuracies. Poets of this era generally lacked mastery over linguistic precision and the natural structures of the Persian language. Abolqasem Lahouti, a pioneer of modern poetry, was not immune to such shortcomings; his works exhibit flaws that compromise their eloquence and rhetorical refinement. Through the present descriptive-analytical study, it becomes evident that Lahouti demonstrates weakness in both the lexical and syntactic domains. His reliance on obscure loanwords from Russian, Tajik, French, and other languages-often producing dissonance and auditory unpleasantness-together with his use of incomprehensible abbreviations and acronyms, as well as spelling inaccuracies, exemplify his lexical deficiencies. Although the defects in his syntactic constructions are less frequent, his poetry nevertheless reveals shortcomings such as lexical disharmony, weak composition, and both verbal and semantic complexity. Collectively, these flaws confirm the validity of critics’ views regarding the lack of eloquence and rhetorical sophistication in Constitutional poets, among whom Lahouti is included. Introduction The Constitutional Revolution stands as one of the most pivotal junctures in Iran's socioـcultural history, leaving profound ramifications for Persian poetry and literature. Constitutionalـera poetry, while distancing itself from longstanding traditions, emerged in direct correlation with political and social events, transforming into an instrument for disseminating liberal, egalitarian, and critical thought. However, this literary evolution, being grounded more in social upheavals than in theoretical or aesthetic foundations, led many poets of this era to descend to a level of eloquence and rhetorical sophistication inferior to preceding traditions. Abolqasem Lahuti, one of the most prominent poets of this period and a pioneer of modernist poetry, endeavored in his Divan to amalgamate modern concepts with traditional forms and poetic experimentation. Nevertheless, his verses suffer from deficiencies in language and expression that challenge their eloquence and rhetorical power. This research aims to focus on Lahuti's Divan to examine the flaws in the eloquence and rhetoric of his poetry and to demonstrate how these flaws have impacted the aesthetic quality and expressive function of his work. Materials and Methods The present study employs a descriptiveـanalytical approach, structured around a direct examination of the Divan of Abolqasem Lahuti (edited by Ahmad Bashiri). The theoretical framework draws upon classical and contemporary rhetorical sources concerning eloquence and rhetoric, as well as the works of other contemporary scholars. Initially, criteria for flaws in eloquence were arranged at two levels: the "word" and the "discourse." Subsequently, the couplets in Lahuti's Divan were analyzed focusing on these criteria to identify and categorize prominent examples of errors and deficiencies. Following this, the findings were interpreted in light of rhetorical theories, and Lahuti's position among Constitutionalـera poets was reassessed from the perspective of eloquence and rhetoric. Research Findings The examination of Lahuti's Divan reveals that he grapples with numerous flaws, particularly at the "word" level. The most significant of these flaws are: Unfamiliar Usage (Gharabatـe Estemal): The frequent use of foreign words borrowed from Russian, Tajik, French, Turkish, Arabic, and English, which not only hinders the audience's comprehension but also introduces cacophony and auditory dissonance. Archaism (Arka'ism): The utilization of obscure and archaic vocabulary during an era characterized by the rise of simplicity and vernacular language, resulting in a poetic language distanced from natural eloquence. Deviation from Morphological Norms (Mokhalefatـe Qiyasـe Sarfi): The use of abbreviations, unfamiliar acronyms, truncated words, and orthographical errors, which introduce grammatical and structural imperfections into the poetry. Incorrect Verb Constructions: Such as the use of fabricated verbs and combinations that violate Persian morphological rules. At the "discourse" level, the following deficiencies were identified: Cacophony of Words (Tanaforـe Kalemat): The presence of hardـtoـpronounce compounds and foreign terminology that disrupt the poetic fluency. Weak Composition and Verbal Complexity (Za'fـe Ta'lif va Ta'qidـe Lafzi): Syntactical disarray in some couplets and an inability to establish logical connections between sentence components. Semantic Complexity (Ta'qidـe Ma'nawi): The use of farـfetched similes and imagery that complicate the understanding of the poetic meaning. Discussion of Results and Conclusion The findings indicate that Lahuti's linguistic weaknesses stem, more than anything, from the historical and social conditions of the Constitutional era and his ideological commitment. Lahuti sought to convey his political and social messages to a general audience, leading him to adopt a simple and direct language. While this choice transformed him into a popular poet, it simultaneously resulted in insufficient attention to the rules of eloquence and rhetoric. The recurrent use of foreign words and contemporary political terminology, although indicative of his engagement with diverse cultures, compromised the coherence and beauty of his poetic language. Furthermore, his propensity for simplicity, instead of enhancing the artistic richness of the poetry, occasionally led to weak composition and rhetorical shortcomings. However, it must be emphasized that Lahuti's poetry holds a unique position in the history of modern Iranian literature in terms of its content and social impact. He was among the first poets to introduce themes of freedom, social justice, and antiـcolonialism into Persian poetry, thereby paving the way for the emergence of modernist poetry. Consequently, although Lahuti's Divan exhibits serious deficiencies in eloquence and rhetoric, its historical and social value is undeniable. This research demonstrates that examining linguistic flaws in Constitutionalـera poetry not only aids in better understanding the standing of its poets but also reveals the relationship between social commitment and linguistic integrity. Lahuti serves as a prime example of poets who, on the path of literary modernism, sacrificed eloquence and rhetorical finesse for the sake of social mission. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Abolqasem Lahouti, Constitutional poetry, rhetorical criticism, eloquence and rhetoric, lexical defects, syntactic defects | ||
| مراجع | ||
منابعامینپور، قیصر. (1376). «شعر مشروطه آیینه دار دورة بیداری». ایران شناخت. شمارة 7. صص: 75ـ38.
آرینپور، یحیی. (1387). از صبا تا نیما. چاپ نهم. تهران: زوار.
آژند، یعقوب. (1385). تجدد ادبی در دورة مشروطه. تهران: موسسة تحقیقات و توسعة علوم انسانی.
آقاحسینی، حسین و میرباقریفرد، سیدعلی اصغر. (1387). «نقد و تحلیل مقدمه کتابهای بلاغی (فصاحت کلمه)». نشریة دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان. شمارة 23. صص: 18ـ1.
دهخدا، علیاکبر. (1377). لغتنامه. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
رضانژاد، غلامحسین. (1367). اصول علم بلاغت. تهران: الزهرا.
رضایی، احمد. (1400). «تحلیل و نقد بلاغت و فصاحت در آثار بلاغی». پژوهشنامة نقد ادبی و بلاغت. شمارة 1. صص: 64ـ43.
سارلی، ناصرقلی. (1390). «بازاندیشی چارچوب نظری فصاحت». نقد ادبی. شمارة 14. صص: 50ـ31.
سپانلو، محمّدعلی. (1376). شهر شعر لاهوتی. تهران: علمی.
سلیمانی، علی و بشیری، محمود. (1393). «بررسی عیوب فصاحت و بلاغت در اشعار میرزادة عشقی». مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی. شمارة 10. صص: 75ـ49.
سلیمانی، علی. (1393). «نقد بلاغی شعر مشروطه با تأکید بر اشعار میرزادة عشقی و ابوالقاسم لاهوتی». پایاننامه کارشناسیارشد. دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
شفیعیکدکنی، محمّدرضا. (1383). ادوار شعر فارسی از مشروطیّت تا سقوط سلطنت. تهران: سخن.
شفیعیکدکنی، محمّدرضا. (1390). با چراغ و آینه. تهران: سخن.
شمیسا، سیروس. (1386). معانی. تهران: میترا.
شمیسا، سیروس. (1388). سبکشناسی شعر. تهران: میترا.
شمیسا، سیروس و بهنام، رسول. (1389). «عیوب فصاحت در کتاب راحة الصدور و آیة السرور بعنوان یکی از مختصههای سبکی این کتاب». سبکشناسی نظم و نثر فارسی (بهار ادب). شمارة 10. صص: 43ـ23.
صیادی، احمدرضا. (1392). «فصاحت کلمه و غرابت استعمال». رشد آموزش زبان و ادب فارسی. شمارة 4. صص: 50ـ47.
عشقی، میرزاده. (1350). کلیات مصور عشقی. به کوشش علیاکبر مشیر سلیمی. تهران: امیرکبیر.
علویمقدم، محمّد و اشرفزاده، رضا. (1387). معانی و بیان. تهران: سمت.
لاهوتی، ابوالقاسم. (1358). دیوان. به کوشش و مقدمة احمد بشیری. تهران: امیرکبیر.
لنگرودی، شمس. (1377). تاریخ تحلیلی شعر نو. تهران: مرکز.
محرمی، رامین؛ اسداللهی، خدابخش؛ پورالخاص، شکراله و فروغیراد، پیام. (1396). «بررسی و تحلیل عیوب فصاحت در شعر کودک». مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی. شمارة 15. صص: 158ـ141.
همایی، جلالالدین. (1386). فنون بلاغت و صناعات ادبی. تهران: هما.
یاحقی، محمّدجعفر. (1375). چون سبوی تشنه. تهران: نیل.
یوسفی، غلامحسین. (1369). چشمة روشن. تهران: علمی.
ReferencesAlavi Moghaddam, M & Ashrafzadeh, R. (2008). Ma’ani va Bayan. Tehran: Samt.] In Persian[
Aghahoseini, H & Mirbagherifard, S.A.A. (2008). Naghd va Tahlilـe Moghaddameـye Ketabhaye Balaghi (Fasahatـe Kalame). Publication of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 23, 1ـ18.] In Persian[
Aminpoor, Gh. (1997). She'rـe Mashrooteh Ayenedarـe Doreye Bidari. Iran recognized, 7, 38ـ75. [In Persian[
Ariyanpoor, Y. (2008). Az Saba ta Nima. Tehran: Zavvar.] In Persian[
Azhand, Y. (2006). Literary Modernity in the Constitutional Era. Tehran: Human Sciences Research and Development Institute.] In Persian[
Dehkhoda, A.A. (1998). Loghatnameh. Tehran: Daneshgahـe Tehran.] In Persian[
Eshghi, M. (1971). Illustrated generalities of ‘Eshghi. By Ali Akbar Moshir Salimi. Tehran: Amir Kabir.] In Persian[
Homayi, J. (2007). Rhetoric and literary arts. Tehran: Homa.] In Persian[
Lahooti, A. (1979). Divan. By Ahmad Bashiri. Tehran: Amir Kabir.] In Persian[
Langaroodi, Sh. (1998). Analytical History of Modern Poetry. Tehran: Markaz. ] In Persian[
Moharrami, R., & Asadollahi, Kh., & Poralkhas, Sh., & Forooghirad, P. (2017). Barresi va Tahlilـe Oyoobـe Fasahat dar She'rـe Koodak. Linguistic and rhetorical studies, 8, 141ـ158.] In Persian[ DOI: https:/ 10.22075/jlrs.2017.10542.1009
Rezaei, A. (2021). Tahlil va Naghdـe Balaghat va Fasahat dar Asarـe Balaghi. Research paper on literary criticism and rhetoric, 10, 43ـ64.] In Persian[ DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jlcr.2020.303887.1485
Rezanezhad, Gh. (1988). Principles of Rhetoric. Tehran: AlـZahra.] In Persian[
Sarli, N.Gh. (2011). Bazandishiـye Charchoobـe Nazariـye Fasahat. Literary criticism, 14, 31ـ50. ]In Persian[
Sayyadi, A.R. (2013). Fasahatـe Kalameh va Gharabatـe Este’mal. The growth of Persian language and literature education, 4, 47ـ50.] In Persian[
Sepanloo, M. A. (1997). The city of Lahuti poetry. Tehran: Elmi.] In Persian[
Shafi’i Kadkani, M.R. (2004). Periods of Persian Poetry from Constitutionalism to the Fall of the Monarchy. Tehran: Sokhan. ] In Persian[
Shafi’i Kadkani, M.R. (2011). With a lamp and a mirror. Tehran: Sokhan.] In Persian[
Shamisa, S. (2007). Ma'ani. Tehran: Mitra.] In Persian[
Shamisa, S. (2009). Poetry Stylistics. Tehran: Mitra.] In Persian[
Shamisa, S & Behnam, R. (2010). Oyoobـe Fasahat dar Ketabـe Rahat olـSodoor va Ayat olـSoroor be Onvanـe Yeki az Mokhtasehaye Sabkiـye in Ketab. Stylistics of Persian Poetry and Prose (Bahar Adab), 10, 23ـ43.] In Persian[
Soleimani, A. (2014). Naghdـe Balaghiـye She'rـe Mashrooteh ba Ta'kid bar Ash'arـe Mirzade ‘Eshghi va Abolghasem Lahooti. Master's thesis. Allameh Tabataba'i University. ] In Persian[
Soleimani, A & Bashiri, M. (2014). Barresiـye ‘Oyoobـe Fasahat va Balaghat dar Ash'arـe Mirzadeـye ‘Eshghi. Linguistic and rhetorical studies, 5, 49ـ75. ]In Persian[ DOI: https:/ 10.22075/jlrs.2017.1832
Yahaghghi, M.J. (1996). as a thirsty pitcher. Tehran: Nil.] In Persian[
Yoosefi, Gh. (1990). The Bright Spring. Tehran: Elmi.] In Persian[
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 166 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 39 |
||