Interpretive Awards in Iranian and International Arbitration Law: Lessons from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal | ||
| Iranian Journal of International and Comparative Law | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 2، شماره 2، اسفند 2024، صفحه 89-114 اصل مقاله (1.82 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/ijicl.2025.11914.1121 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyyed Hasan Hosseini Moghaddam* 1؛ Mohammad Hossein Taghipour-Darzi-Naghibi2؛ Mojtaba Khalili Gorji Mahalleh* 3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 3Master’s Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Notwithstanding the explicit provision for interpretive awards under Article 32 of Iran’s Law on International Commercial Arbitration, their application in domestic arbitration remains contentious. However, their existence may be inferred from instruments such as Article 9 of the 2022 Arbitration Fee Regulations. The absence of a comprehensive definition for interpretive awards has perpetuated conceptual confusion and facilitated their misuse as substitutes for revision procedures—a problematic tendency that, when considered alongside the significant benefits of properly utilized interpretive awards, underscores the critical importance of precisely understanding this legal mechanism. Interpretive awards must be conceptualized within established legal frameworks including res judicata and functus officio. Crucially, such awards address only those ambiguities arising from either drafting deficiencies or divergent party interpretations, rendering them fundamentally distinct from supplementary or corrective awards. In international law, interpretive awards appear in various instruments including the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules (which govern the Iran-U.S. arbitration agreement). International practice demonstrates that valid interpretation requests must satisfy specific criteria: (1) demonstration of genuine ambiguity; (2) pursuit of clarification rather than substantive modification; (3) direct relevance to the award’s scope; and (4) grounding in established factual circumstances. Proper requests should additionally include: (a) the ambiguous text; (b) explanation of the ambiguity; and (c) the parties’ conflicting interpretations. The jurisprudence of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal confirms that failure to meet these requirements has resulted in uniform rejection of interpretation requests. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Arbitrator' s interpretive award؛ Arbitration؛ Iran-US claims؛ International commercial arbitration؛ Interpretative award | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alidadi Deh-kohneh, Ali and Abuzar Jowhari, Arbitration Law in Practice: With Iranian Judicial Procedure and an Analysis of UNCITRAL Regulations (7th edn, Judiciary Publication 2024) [In Persian].
Amir Moezzi, Ahmad, International Arbitration in Commercial Disputes (3rd edn, Dadgostar Publication 2012) [In Persian].
Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th edn, OUP 2015).
De la Pradelle, A and N Politis, Recueil des arbitrages internationaux, vol 1 (Noël Texier et Fils 1905) 530–544
Iranshahi, Alireza, Domestic Arbitration Law (1st edn, Mizan Publication 2023).
Kakavand, Mohammad, Arbitration Law in the Rulings of Judges and Arbitrators (vol 2, Dr Mohammad Hossein Shahbazi Legal Studies Institute 2020) [In Persian].
Karimi, Abbas, Civil Procedure (1st edn, Majd Publication 2007) [In Persian].
Katouzian, Nasser, The Authority of Res Judicata in Civil Claims (4th edn, 3rd revision, Mizan Publication 1989) [In Persian].
Khodabakhshi, Abdullah, Arbitration Law and Related Claims in Judicial Practice (9th edn, Sahami Enteshar Publication 2012) [In Persian].
Lal, Hamish, Brendan Casey, Tania Iakovenko-Grässer, Léa Defranchi, Revision, Interpretation And Correction Of Awards And Supplementary Decisions, 6th Edition, Investment Treaty Arbitration Review, June 2021.
Lalive, Pierre, Questions Actuelles Concernant L'arbitrage International, Cours I.H.E.I., 1959-1960.
Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar, Legal Encyclopedia (vol 5, 3rd edn, Amir Kabir Publication 1996) [In Persian].
Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar, Legal Terminology (33rd edn, Ganj-e Danesh Publication 2020) [In Persian].
Mafi, Homayoun, A Commentary on Iran’s Law on International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, Judicial Science and Administrative Services University Press 2018).
Matin Daftari, Ahmad, Civil and Commercial Procedure (vol 1, 1st edn, Majd Scientific and Cultural Association 1999) [In Persian].
Mohajeri, Ali, A Comprehensive Treatise on Civil Procedure (vol 4, 1st edn, Fekrsazan Publication 2007) [In Persian].
Mohammadi, Sam, Preliminary Objections and Arbitration (1st edn, Majd Publication 2024) [In Persian].
Mousavi, Seyed Abbas, Enforcement of Civil Judgments (vol 1, 1st edn, Ganj-e Danesh Publication 2024) [In Persian].
Mousavi, Seyed Abbas, Enforcement of Civil Judgments (vol 1, 2nd edn, Dadgostar Publication 2016) [In Persian].
Mousavi, Seyed Abbas, Enforcement of Civil Judgments (vol 4, 1st edn, Ganj-e Danesh Publication 2024) [In Persian].
Mozafari, Ahmad and Mehdi Nikfar, Selected Judgments of the Hague Court (vol 2, Ghoghnous Publication 2000) [In Persian].
Raeder, A., L'arbitrage International Chez Les Hellènes, Publications Of The Norwegian Nobel Institute, Kristiania: Aschehoug, 1912.
Sammartano, Mauro, International Arbitration Law And Practice, Kluwer Law International, 2nd Ed, 2001.
Schreuer, Christoph H., Loretta Malintoppi, August Reinisch, Anthony Sinclair, The Icsid Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Seifi, Seyed Jamal (tr Parvin Mohammadi Dinani), ‘Iran’s Law on International Commercial Arbitration in Harmony with the UNCITRAL Model Law’ (1998) 23 International Law Journal. [In English and In Persian]
Shams, Abdullah, Advanced Civil Procedure (vol 3, 35th edn, Drak Publication 2009) [In Persian].
Shams, Abdullah, Enforcement of Civil Judgments (vol 1, 1st edn, Drak Publication 2018) [In Persian].
Shiravi, Abdolhossein, International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, SAMT Publication 2012) [In Persian].
Tamjidi, Ladan, International Arbitration (1st edn, Farhang-Shenasi Publication 2011) [In Persian].
Vekzijl, J.H.W., International Law In Historical Perspective, Part. Viii: Inter- States Disputes And Their Settlement, A.W. Sijthoff, Leyden, 1976.
Yousefzadeh, Morteza, Arbitration Procedure (1st edn, Sahami Enteshar Publications 2013) [In Persian].
Caron, D. D. And L. F. Reed, Post Award Proceedings Under The Uncitral Arbitration Rules, In Arbitration International, Vol. 11 No. 4, 1995.
Cor, Jean Pierre, L'affaire De La Frontière Des Andes, A.F.D.I., 1968.
Khodabakhshi, Abdullah and Maryam Abedinzadeh Shahri, The Role of the Arbitrator After the Issuance of an Award (2019) International Law Journal 61 [In Persian].
Knutson, R. D. A, The Interpretation Of Arbitral Awards - When Is A Final Award Not Final?, In Journal Of International Arbitration, Vol. 11,No. 2, 1994.
Koohpayeei, Tanaz, Mohsen Mohebi and Saeid Mansouri, Revisiting International Arbitral Awards in the Realm of Foreign Investment Law (2022) 21(51) Legal Research Journal [In Persian].
Mafi, Homayoun and Hossein Tari, The Authority of Res Judicata in Arbitral Awards in Iranian and American Law (2015) 19(4) Comparative Law Research [In Persian].
Mirshekari, Abbas and Mohammad Kazem Mahtabpour, The Competent Authority for Interpreting Arbitral Awards (2020) 50(3) Private Law Studies Quarterly [In Persian].
Ph. Fouchard, «La Nature Juridique De L'arbitrage Du Tribunal Des Différends Irano-Américains»Cahiers Du Cedin, 1re Journée D'actualité Internationale, 19 Avril 1984.
Raeisi, Reza, Alireza Iranshahi and Hamidreza Salehi, The Nature and Effects of Court Decisions in Interpreting Arbitral Awards (2024) 25(2) Legal Research Quarterly [In Persian].
Stern, Brigitte, Un coup d'arrêt à la marginalisation du consentement dans l'arbitrage international, Rev. arb, 2000.
Wong, Venus Valentina and Dalibor Valinčić, The Arbitral Award: Form, Global Arbitration Review, 17 May 2023.
Zoller Elisabeth. Observations Sur La Révision Et L'interprétation Des Sentences Arbitrales. In: Annuaire Français De Droit International, Volume 24, 1978.
American Bell International Inc v Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No 48-48-3, Award No 255-48-3 (19 September 1986).
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v United States of America), Verbatim Record (31 March 2004) CR 2004/10, 38–42 (Mr Lowe).
Case Concerning Temple of Preah Vihear (Interpretation) [2013] ICJ Rep 281., ICJ Doc No 2012/36 (29 November 2012).
Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia v Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents, vol V (ICJ 1984) 243 (Abi-Saab).
Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea Intervening) [2002] ICJ Rep 303.
Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v Thailand) [1962] ICJ Rep 6.
Dominguez v Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No 368-10537-2, Award No 586-10537-2 (15 April 1997).
Eastman Kodak Company v Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No 514-227-3, Award No 329-227-3 (11 November 1987).
Endo Laboratories, Inc v Islamic Republic of Iran, Trasspharm Trading Company, Iran Wallace Company, Darou Pakhsh and Bonyade Mostazafan, IUSCT Case No 366-10536-2, Award No 585-10536-2 (15 April 1997).
Ford Aerospace & Communications Corp v Islamic Republic of Iran and Central Bank of Iran, IUSCT Case No 289-93-1, Award No 280-93-1 (15 March 1986).
Ford Aerospace & Communications Corp v Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No 289-93-1, Award No 280-93-1 (15 March 1986).
International Peace Conference, Deuxième Conférence internationale de la Paix: Actes et Documents (vol I, Lahaye Imprimerie Nationale).
Interpretation of Judgments Nos 7 and 8 (Factory at Chorzów) PCIJ Rep Series A No 13.
Norman Gabay (Nourollah Armanfar) v Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No 812-812-3, Award No 603-812-3 (22 January 1998).
Paul Donin de Rosière and Panacaviar SA v Islamic Republic of Iran and Iran Fisheries Company, IUSCT Case No 498-375-1, Award No 327-498-1 (3 August 1987).
PepsiCo, Inc. v. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Foundation for the Oppressed, Zamzam Bottling Company and others, IUSCT Case No. 18.
Phibro Corporation v. Ministry of War-Etka Co. Ltd., Government Trading Corporation and The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No. 474.
Sedco, Inc. v. National Iranian Oil Company and The Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case Nos. 128 and 129.
Uiterwyk Corporation, Jan C Uiterwyk, Maria Uiterwyk, Robert Uiterwyk, Hendrik Uiterwyk and Jan D Uiterwyk v Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Roads and Transportation, Ports and Shipping Organization, Iran Express Lines and Sea-Man-Pak, IUSCT Case No 381-158-1, Award No 375-381-1 (6 July 1988).
Baptista, Luiz Olavo, Correction and Clarification of Arbitral Awards (Discussion Paper, ICCA Congress, Rio de Janeiro, 25 May 2010).
Deputy of Human Resources and Cultural Affairs of Tehran Provincial Justice Department, Judicial Practice of Tehran Courts: Arbitration (4th edn, 2023) [In Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 195 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 120 |
||