چیستی فناوری: تأملی بر اساس هستیشناسی بسکار | ||
| پژوهشهای فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 26، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 5-26 اصل مقاله (2.04 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2024.11664.3181 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مصطفی تقوی* 1؛ مریم پوست فروش2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه فلسفه علم، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، گروه فلسفه علم، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این مقاله، بر اساس هستیشناسی مطرح در فلسفه علم روی بسکار، تعریفی برای فناوری ارائه شده است. درک چیستی فناوری پیشنیازی جدی برای پاسخگویی به پرسشهای کلیدی در حوزه فلسفه فناوری است، پرسشهایی در حوزۀ تعامل فناوری و جامعه، اخلاق و فناوری، فناوری و دانش، آزادی و دموکراسی و فناوری، و بسیاری مباحث دیگر. مقاله با بهرهگیری از هستیشناسی بسکاری و تحلیل ساختارهای طبیعی، مصنوعی و اجتماعی، فناوری را به عنوان برهمکنش انسان با ساختاری ترکیبی تعریف میکند که هدف آن دستیابی به کارکردهایی مشخص است. بر اساس این تعریف، فناوری نه امری خنثی، بلکه ارزشبار و بدیلپذیر است، به این معنا که مسیر توسعه و کارکردهای آن میتواند با توجه به ارزشها و انتخابهای اجتماعی تغییر کند. مقاله نشان میدهد که فناوری محصول تعامل پیچیدۀ انسان با ساختارهای طبیعی، مصنوعی و اجتماعی است، و همین تعامل امکان ایجاد شکلهای مختلف فناوری را فراهم میکند. در این مقاله تلاش شده به لحاظ فلسفی فهمی عمیقتر از چیستی فناوری ارائه شود. این فهم نشان میدهد که در مواجهه با فناوری نمیتوان منفعل بود و میتوان فعالانه در شکلگیری آن نقش ایفا کرد. به این ترتیب محتوای مقاله روی خوشی به دیدگاه جبرانگاری فناوری نشان نمیدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| فناوری؛ مصنوع فنی؛ ساختار فیزیکی؛ ساختار اجتماعی؛ عاملیت؛ روی بسکار | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| فلسفه علم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| What is Technology: A Reflection Based on Bhaskar's Ontology | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mostafa Taqavi1؛ Maryam Poostforush2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy of Science, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. Student, Department of Philosophy of Science, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The article demonstrates that technology is a product of the complex interaction between humans and natural, artificial, and social structures, which enables the creation of various forms of technology. It strives to provide a deeper philosophical understanding of what technology is. This understanding reveals that one cannot be passive when confronted with technology; instead, individuals can play an active role in shaping it. Consequently, the content of the article does not present a favorable view of technological determinism. What is Technology? In this article, a definition of technology is presented based on the ontology discussed in the philosophy of science by Bhaskar. Understanding what technology is, serves as a serious prerequisite for addressing key questions in the field of philosophy of technology; these questions pertain to the interaction between technology and society, ethics and technology, technology and knowledge, freedom and democracy in relation to technology, among many other topics. The article utilizes Bhaskar’s ontology and analyzes natural, artificial, and social structures to define technology as the interaction of humans with a composite structure aimed at achieving specific functionalities. According to this definition, technology is not a neutral entity but rather value-laden and substitutable; this means that its development path and functionalities can change based on social values and choices. The article demonstrates that technology is a product of the complex interaction between humans and natural, artificial, and social structures, which enables the creation of various forms of technology. It strives to provide a deeper philosophical understanding of what technology is. This understanding reveals that one cannot be passive when confronted with technology; instead, individuals can play an active role in shaping it. Consequently, the content of the article does not present a favorable view of technological determinism. Introduction The philosophy of technology is a dynamic branch of contemporary philosophy that strongly necessitates a deepening and expansion of its philosophical and theoretical foundations. From Heidegger and Jacques Ellul to Feenberg and Verbeek, the reflections of technology philosophers have concentrated on questions such as the nature of technology, its structural impacts on humanity and society, and the connections between technology and power. Nevertheless, the philosophical underpinnings of this field still require reinforcement. To address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, we need more profound philosophical reflections that can strengthen the epistemological and ethical foundations of the philosophy of technology and open new horizons for confronting increasingly complex issues. In this regard, we must not overlook the untapped potential within philosophical theories. In this article, we aim to establish a basis for contemplating the essence and nature of technology based on the ontology presented by the prominent philosopher of science, Roy Bhaskar, while considering his natural science philosophy as well as his philosophy of social science. Although Bhaskar himself did not focus on issues in the philosophy of technology, his reflections on reality (both physical and social) can be utilized to philosophize within the realm of technology. He understands reality based on its causal powers, which provides a foundation for this article to draw upon Bhaskar’s ideas in order to comprehend technology. PGMs and SGMs in definition of technology In the first section of this article, we briefly explore Bhaskar’s philosophy of natural science and discuss the physical generative mechanisms or physical structures. The second section delves into Bhaskar’s philosophy of social science, outlining the differences and similarities between social structures and physical structures. Additionally, we examine the limitations that confront us in the study of social structures. With consideration of these two sections, we become acquainted with both physical generative mechanisms (PGM) and social generative mechanisms (SGM). In the third section, we turn our attention to defining technology, focusing on the insights gained from the study of Bhaskar’s philosophy. We will initially present two definitions of technology, each of which has its criticisms. Therefore, we propose a more comprehensive definition that considers both physical and social structures while also recognizing the role of humans as causal agents. This definition views technology as a form of human activity in which humanity, by employing this composite structure in a specific manner, brings forth a particular functionality. Conclusion In this article, we have utilized the ontology articulated within the framework of critical realism proposed by Bhaskar to provide a definition of technology. Two key concepts, namely natural generative mechanisms and social generative mechanisms, were employed in this context. The article demonstrates that the formation of technology typically involves the intertwined interplay of three types of structures: natural, artificial, and social. However, it has been shown that technology cannot be simplistically regarded as a composite structure of these three types. The role of human agency must not be overlooked in defining technology. Thus, technology is ultimately defined as the interaction of humanity with a composite structure aimed at achieving specific functionalities. According to this definition, technology is no longer merely a neutral and static tool; rather, it is a dynamic and value-laden structure that possesses substitutability across various social and cultural contexts. This perspective shifts technology from the realm of necessity to that of possibility, where the roles of values, social choices, and human objectives become prominent in shaping technology and its functionalities. Consequently, technology can be harnessed as a means to promote social justice, preserve the environment, and address diverse cultural needs. On the other hand, our analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the multi-stability of technologies. This means that the aforementioned tripartite structures may be interpreted and understood differently by various social groups, leading to diverse functionalities. This perspective reflects the complexity and interdependence of technology on human interpretation, which evolves based on human and social choices, allowing for a conscious and purposeful expression of human agency in its developmental trajectory. Ultimately, this article illustrates that the development of alternative technologies is feasible, and this potential can serve as a foundation for rethinking the form and role of technology in the future. Foresight regarding technology and the pursuit of better alternatives necessitate such a philosophical foundation that is articulated through the definition of technology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| technology, artifact, physical structure, social structure, agency, Roy Bhaskar | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Achterhuis, H. (2001). The politics of technology. University of California Press.
Achterhuis, H. (2003). The failure of technology. University of California Press.
Achterhuis, H. (2010). The ethics of technology. University of California Press.
Archer, et al. (1998). General introduction. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592 Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307667 Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2010). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Macmillan International Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28521-8 Berlin, I. (2014). Two concepts of liberty. In N. Warburton, Philosophy: Basic readings (pp. 231-237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091822-3 Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of naturalism. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 8(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00389.x Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756332
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732 Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879849 Bhaskar, R. (2010a). Plato etc: Problems of philosophy and their resolution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860069 Bhaskar, R. (2010b). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843314
Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542942
Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177298 Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105376
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Alfred A. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101837
Ellul, J. (2003). The “autonomy” of the technological phenomenon. Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, 2, 430-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0037
Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689388 Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146158.002.0001
Floridi, L. (2014). The 4th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
Heidegger, M. (2003). The question concerning technology. In D. M. Kaplan, Readings in the philosophy of technology (pp. 9-24). Rowman & Littlefield.
Ihde, D. (1996). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3106183
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. State University of New York Press.
Jaspers, K. (2014). Man in the modern age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823690
Kaidesoja, T. (2009). The concept of social structure in Roy Bhaskar’s critical realism. In Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 376. University of Jyväskylä.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 1, 225-258.
Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common knowledge, 3(2).
Lewis, P. (2000). Realism, causality and the problem of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00129
Mitcham, C. (2022). What is living and what is dead in classic European philosophy of technology? In S. Vallor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of technology (pp. 19-34). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.3 Outhwaite, W. (2001). In defense of social structure. Studies in Social and Political Thought, Issue, 3-15.
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9010-0
Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0143-5
Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3103332
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-36. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21 Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological determinism: What it is and why it matters. In G. J. Robson & J. Y. Tsou (Eds.), Technology ethics (pp. 26-33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189466-6 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 867 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 559 |
||