Optimizing Resource Allocation within the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Comparative Study | ||
| Iranian Journal of International and Comparative Law | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 2، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 198-215 اصل مقاله (561.47 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/ijicl.2024.11380.1104 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Rahim Nobahar* 1؛ Fatemeh Saffari2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2PhD Candidate of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The relationship between increased budget allocations to the judiciary and improvements in judicial behavior and performance has gained prominence in recent years. However, given the limited nature of resources, extensive funding for the justice system often comes at the expense of other societal needs. Thus, optimizing resource allocation within the judiciary is essential. This optimization requires identifying challenges specific to the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran and examining the experiences of other nations. This article argues that effective governance demands budget transparency, and arbitrary resource allocation—without considering medium- and long-term planning—presents significant challenges. Despite the implementation of six medium-term plans since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, a coherent link between these plans and the budgetary process remains elusive in Iran. This disconnect can be partly attributed to the influence of bargaining dynamics on budget allocation. Additional challenges include a lack of fiscal discipline, an excessive reliance on incremental budgeting, inadequate use of an efficient accounting system, and ineffective oversight by other branches of government regarding the financial performance of the judiciary. Experiences from various countries indicate that when budgeting systems resist reform, a viable solution involves identifying and strengthening components within the existing institutional framework that enhance efficiency. Given that implementing Performance Budgeting within the judiciary may be impractical, a more effective approach may involve adhering to traditional budgeting methods. Ultimately, enhancing budget transparency and facilitating public access to budgetary information can empower citizens, promote government accountability, and yield mutual benefits. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran؛ Judicial Independence؛ Financial Supervision؛ Budgeting؛ Judicial Planning | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghaeitouq M, ‘Examining the Budget of the Judiciary in the Light of the Articles of the Constitution’ in Judicial Research 1 (Judiciary Press and Publishing Center 2016). [In Persian]
Amirkabiri A R, Almasi H, and Mahmoudi H, ‘Performance Budgeting: A Tool for Clarifying the Relationship between Consumed Resources and the Results Obtained in the Organization’ (2014) 174 Work and Society Monthly 12. [In Persian]
Babaei H, Government Budgeting in Iran (from Theory to Policy) (Commercial Print and Publications Company 2000). [In Persian]
Cross F B, ‘Thoughts on Goldilocks and Judicial Independence’ (2003) 64 Ohio State Law Journal 195.
Ebrahiminejad M, The Principle of Budget Preparation, Formulation and Control (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman 2008). [In Persian]
Essex A, ‘Reducing Admissions to Jail and Prisons’ (National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) 2021).
Etebarian A, Emadzadeh M, and Rouhani A, ‘Investigating the Role of Accounting Information in Budget and Budgeting’ (2013) 10 Journal of Accounting Research 1. [In Persian]
Farajvand E, The Process of Formulation to Budget Control (Forouzesh Press 2006). [In Persian]
Farzib A R, Governmental Budgeting in Iran (Governmental Management Training Center 1996). [In Persian]
Ghasemi H R, ‘The Historical Locks of Iran's Budgeting System: Past, Present, and Prospects’ (2021) Institute of Religion and Economic Studies. [In Persian]
Gholizadeh R Gh, Budgeting System in Iran (Theory and Practice) (Chaparpub 2012). [In Persian]
Hashemi M, The Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2 (Mizan Publication 2007). [In Persian]
Hassanabadi M, Najjar Sarraf A R, A Total Model for Performance Based Budgeting Diamond Model (Industrial Research & Training Center of Iran 2010). [In Persian]
Hedayati Zafarghandi M, ‘The Role and Function of the Supreme Audit Court in Financial Supervision’ (2017) 18 International Journal of Nations Research 45. [In Persian]
Hosseini M R, Fatehizadeh M, and Tehrani I, ‘Article 75 of the Constitution and Judiciary's Powers in Budgeting’ (2012) 70 Scientific Quarterly Journal of Majlis & Rahbord 133. [In Persian]
Jalali M and Tangestani M Gh, ‘Examining Article 75 of the Constitution with an Emphasis on the Opinions of the Guardian Council Regarding the Approvals of the Islamic Parliament up to the Eighth Period’ (2015) 10 Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge 69. [In Persian]
Khorramabadi Q, ‘The Council Management of the Judiciary Gives a Sense of Independence to the Judges’ (2009) 58 Judiciary Monthly 54. [In Persian]
Leachman M, Chettiar I, and Geare B, ‘Improving Budget Analysis of State Criminal Justice Reforms: A Strategy for Better Outcomes and Saving Money’ (2012) Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, American Civil Liberties Union.
Lienert I, ‘The Legal Framework for Budget Systems (An International Comparison)’ (2004) 4 (3) OECD Journal on Budgeting (Special Issue).
Mehrpour H, A Concise of the Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Dadgostar Publication 2014). [In Persian]
Office of Democracy and Governance, Guidance for Promoting Judicial Independence and Impartiality (U.S. Agency for International Development 2002).
Rezaei M, ‘Performance Budgeting Requirements in Iran’ (2016) 51 Journal of Public Law Research 55. [In Persian]
Sie J, ‘How 4 States Cut Their Criminal Justice Budgets Without Sacrificing Safety’ (2022) National Conference of State Legislatures.
Tangestani M Gh, Independence and Responsibility of Judiciary (Mizan Publication 2018). [In Persian]
The Office of Budget and Planning, Budgeting in Iran (Problems & Challenges) (Majlis Research Center 2002). [In Persian]
Webber D, ‘Good Budgeting, Better Justice: Modern Budget Practices for the Judicial Sector’ 3 Law and Development Working Paper Series, Legal Vice Presidency, The World Bank, USA.
Annotated Report of the Deliberations of the Assembly for Revising the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1989). [In Persian]
Annotated version of the deliberations of the Assembly for the Final Review of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1979). [In Persian]
Momenipour E, ‘Economic Analysis of the Petroleum Ownership in the Light of Efficient Property Rights’ (MA Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University 2015). [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 94 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 97 |
||