The Revival of Teleology After its Death by Darwin | ||
| پژوهشهای فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 26، شماره 3، مهر 1403، صفحه 107-134 اصل مقاله (1.55 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2024.11464.3151 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Nima Narimani* | ||
| Ph.D., Department of Philosophy of Religion, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Two distinct teleological perspectives emerge from the ancient Greek tradition. 1) Platonic teleology, which represents teleology as the result of intentional agency and is the origin of the idea of design; and 2) Aristotelian teleology, which introduces teleology as the result of natural and intrinsic causes. The preceding framework for understanding nature was superseded by the advent of the modern era and the establishment of the scientific method. Nevertheless, despite the prevailing skepticism regarding the possibility and utility of teleology in the modern era, it is asserted that several prominent scientists of the modern era are staunch defenders of teleology (design). However, with Darwin’s proposal of the theory of evolution, the path to the destruction of teleology was initiated. This article examines the interconnection between Darwin’s theory of evolution (then Neo-Darwinism) and teleology, focusing on how this theory effectively undermines the teleological perspective. However, it seems that recent findings in the field of biology challenge this dominant view and open the way for the revival of teleology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Teleology؛ philosophy of biology؛ Darwin؛ Neo-Darwinism؛ reductionism | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| فلسفه علم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Revival of Teleology, After Its Death By Darwin | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nima Narimani | ||
| Ph.D., Department of Philosophy of Religion, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Two distinct teleological perspectives emerge from the ancient Greek tradition. (1) Platonic teleology, which represents teleology as the result of intentional agency and is the origin of the idea of design; and (2) Aristotelian teleology, which introduces teleology as the result of natural and intrinsic causes. The preceding framework for understanding nature was superseded by the advent of the modern era and the establishment of the scientific method. Nevertheless, despite the prevailing skepticism regarding the possibility and utility of teleology in the modern era, it is asserted that several prominent scientists of the modern era are staunch defenders of teleology (design). However, with Darwin's proposal of the theory of evolution, the path to the destruction of teleology was initiated. This article examines the interconnection between Darwin's theory of evolution (then neo-Darwinism) and teleology, focusing on how this theory effectively undermines the teleological perspective. However, it seems that recent findings in the field of biology challenge this dominant view and open the way for the revival of teleology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Teleology, Evolution, Design, Darwinism, Reductionism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ariew, A. (2007). Teleology. In D. L. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge University Press.
Ayala, F. (2004). Design without designer: Darwin’s greatest discovery. In W. Dembski & M. Ruse (Eds.), Debating design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, J. (2013). Chance and design. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press.
Conway Morris, S. (2007). Life’s solution: Inevitable humans in a lonely universe (4th print). Cambridge University Press.
Conway Morris, S. (2009). The predictability of evolution: Glimpses into a post-Darwinian world. Naturwissenschaften, 96(11), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0607-9 Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker. W. W Norton and Company.
Dresow, M., & Love, A. C. (2023). Teleonomy: Revisiting a proposed conceptual replacement for teleology. Biological Theory, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00424-y Forber, P. (2020). Contemporary teleology. In J. K. McDonough (Ed.), Teleology: A history. Oxford University Press.
Futuyma, D. J., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2017). Evolution (4th ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1994). Darwin’s language may seem teleological, but his thinking is another matter. Biology & Philosophy, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850377 Harrison, P. (2019). Laws of God or laws of nature? Natural order in the Early Modern Period. In P. Harrison & J. H. Roberts (Eds.), Science without God? Rethinking the history of scientific naturalism (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. R. (2017). Aristotelian mechanistic explanation. In J. Rocca (Ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and medical approaches (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139567855
Kampourakis, K. (Ed.). (2013). The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (vol. 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5
Kauffman, S. (2008). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason and religion. Basic Books.
Kauffman, S. (2013). Evolution beyond Newton, Darwin, and entailing law: The origin of complexity in the evolving biosphere. In C. H. Lineweaver, P. C. W. Davies, & M. Ruse (Eds.), Complexity and the arrow of time (pp. 162-190). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225700.011
Kojonen, E. V. R. (2021). The compatibility of evolution and design. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69683-2
Leidenhag, M. (2021). Purpose for and within creation: A theological appraisal of organismic teleology. Modern Theology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12689 Lennox, J. G. (2013). Darwin and teleology. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press.
Lennox, J. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2013). Biological teleology: The need for history. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (vol. 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5 Mayr, E. (1992). The Idea of teleology. Journal of the History of Ideas, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2709913
Mayr, E. (1998). The multiple meanings of “teleological.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 20(1).
Mayr, E. (2007). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline ( 1st paperback ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mcdonough, J. K. (2011). The heyday of teleology and Early Modern Philosophy: Teleology and Early Modern Philosophy. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 35(1), 179-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2011.00218.x
McDonough, J. K. (2020). Not dead yet: Teleology and the “scientific revolution.” In Teleology: A history. Oxford University Press.
McGrath, A. E. (2011). Darwinism and the divine: Evolutionary thought and natural theology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Noble, D. (2006). The music of life: Biology beyond the genome. Oxford University Press.
Noble, D. (2013). Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology. Experimental Physiology, 98(8). https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071134 Noble, D. (2015). Evolution beyond Neo-Darwinism: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218(1). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.106310
Noble, D. (2017). Dance to the tune of life. Cambridge University Press.
Noble, D. (2021). The illusions of the modern synthesis. Biosemiotics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09405-3 Pasnau, R. (2020). Teleology in the Later Middle Ages. In J. K. McDonough (Ed.), Teleology: A history. Oxford University Press.
Perlman, M. (2004). The modern philosophical resurrection of teleology. Monist, 87(1). https://doi.org/10.5840/monist20048711
Richardson, K. (2020). Avicenna on teleology. In J. K. McDonough (Ed.), Teleology: A history. Oxford University Press.
Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution (3rd ed.). Blackwell Pub.
Rocca, J. (2017). Introduction. In J. Rocca (Ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and medical approaches (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139567855
Ruse, M. (2000). Teleology: esterday, today, and tomorrow? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00046-1 Scolnicov, S. (2017). Atemporal teleology in Plato. In J. Rocca (Ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and medical approaches (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139567855
Sedley, D. N. (2007). Creationism and its critics in antiquity. University of California press.
Shapiro, J. (2011). Evolution: A view from the 21st century. FT Press Science.
Shapiro, J. (2013). Rethinking the (im)possible in evolution. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 111(2–3), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.08.016 Shapiro, J. (2017). Biological action in read–write genome evolution. Interface Focus, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0115
Shapiro, J. (2019). No genome is an island: Toward a 21st century agenda for evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1447(1), 21-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14044
Shapiro, J. (2023). Evolutionary change Is naturally biological and purposeful. In P. A. Corning, S. A. Kauffman, D. Noble, J. A. Shapiro, R. I. Vane-Wright, & A. Pross (Eds.), Evolution “on purpose”: Teleonomy in living systems. The MIT Press.
Silva, I. (2019). From extrinsic design to intrimsic telelology. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), 61-78.
Solinas, M. (2015). From Aristotle’s teleology to Darwin’s genealogy: The stamp of inutility. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wattles, J. (2006). Teleology past and present. Zygon®, 41(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00749.x | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 650 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 338 |
||