Is Knowledge a Justified Belief? | ||
| پژوهشهای فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 26، شماره 3، مهر 1403، صفحه 175-192 اصل مقاله (1.51 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2024.10813.3070 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Seyyed Jaaber Mousavirad* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Allamah Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Epistemologists have widely accepted that truth, justification, and belief are necessary conditions for knowledge. This article challenges the necessity of the two components, “belief” and “justification”, in the definition of knowledge. It argues that belief is distinct from knowledge; belief is an act of will, whereas knowledge is acquired automatically. One may possess knowledge without being actively willing to believe it, and conversely, one may will to believe something without actually knowing it. Additionally, justification should be seen as a method of validating knowledge, not a fundamental part of its definition. Therefore, knowledge without justification remains knowledge, even though its truth cannot be proven. Building on this perspective, the proposed definition of knowledge shifts to “awareness or recognition of facts.” According to this definition, the Gettier problem and the lottery paradox find alternative solutions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| knowledge؛ justification؛ belief؛ truth؛ the Gettier problem | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| معرفت شناسی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Is Knowledge a Justified Belief? | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyyed Jaaber Mousavirad | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Allamah Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Epistemologists have widely accepted that truth, justification, and belief are necessary conditions for knowledge. This article challenges the necessity of the two components, "belief" and "justification," in the definition of knowledge. It argues that belief is distinct from knowledge; belief is an act of will, whereas knowledge is acquired automatically. One may possess knowledge without actively willing to believe it, and conversely, one may will to believe something without actually knowing it. Additionally, justification should be seen as a method of validating knowledge, not a fundamental part of its definition. Therefore, knowledge without justification remains knowledge, even though its truth cannot be proven. Building on this perspective, the proposed definition of knowledge shifts to "awareness or recognition of facts." According to this definition, the Gettier problem and the lottery paradox find alternative solutions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Justification, Belief, Truth, Gettier problem, voluntarism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Booth, A. R. (2016). Islamic philosophy and the ethics of belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of intention. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J. (2017). The Gettier case and intuition. In C. de A. Rodrigo Borges & P. D. Klein (Eds.), Explaining knowledge. Oxford.
Clifford, W. K. (2012). The ethics of belief. In M. R. L. Pojman (Ed.), Philosophy of religion; an anthology. Wadsworth.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford University Press.
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(7), 121-123.
Goldman, A. I. (1967). A causal theory of knowing. The Journal of Philosophy, 64(12), 357-372.
Hetherington, S. (1998). Actually knowing. The Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 453-469.
Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford .
Hume, D. (2008). A treatise of human nature. NuVision Publications.
James, W. (2012). The will to believe . In M. R. Louis Pojman (Ed.), Philosophy of religion; an anthology. Wadsworth .
Jonathan M. Weinberg, & Stephen Stich, S. N. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 64(12), 429-460.
Kierkegaard, S. (1962). Philosophical fragments. Princeton University Press.
Kyburg, H. E. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Wesleyan University Press.
Lehrer, K. (1965). Knowledge, truth and evidence. Analysis, 25(5), 168-175.
Lycan, W. G. (1977). Evidence one does not possess. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 55(2), 114-126.
Moore, G. E. (1993). Moore’s Paradox. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), G.E. Moore: selected writings. Routledge.
Peels, R. (2017). Responsible beliefs. Oxford University Press.
Pojman, L. P. (2000). What can we know? Wadsworth.
Pritchard, D. (2019). The Gettier Problem and epistemic luck. In S. Hetherington (Ed.), The Gettier Problem. Cambridge.
Russell, B. (2009). Human knowledge : Its scope and limits; Routledge classics. Taylor & Francis; Routledge.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2023). Belief. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
Steup, M. (2018). Doxastic voluntarism and up-to-me-ness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26(4), 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1511148 Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Cambrdige.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 648 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 272 |
||