Cognitive Science and Philosophy of Religion: Embracing the Human Perspective | ||
| پژوهشهای فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 26، شماره 3، مهر 1403، صفحه 85-106 اصل مقاله (1.54 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2024.10483.3025 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Javad Darvish Aghajani* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is a relatively young field that explores the intersection between science and religion. Some argue that CSR, by employing purely explanatory methods and presupposing methodological naturalism, has secularized and materialized religion. Others believe that explanatory methods are not the sole approach in CSR, and the use of other methods is permissible. This article aims to show how CSR has influenced the entire realm of philosophy of religion and the nature of this impact. It examines various perspectives on the extent of CSR’s influence on the philosophy of religion, particularly analyzing its effect on the proofs of natural theology. The second part demonstrates that contrary to the dominant literature, the impact of CSR can extend beyond merely strengthening or weakening theological arguments and can be used to argue for the reform of religious beliefs. This argument is pursued from four different perspectives: first, the concept of God, arguing that weakening classic proofs does not imply weakening belief in God; second, the methodology of studying religion, advocating for methodological pluralism; third, the topic of revelation and the role of humans in religion, suggesting that a behavioral shift desirable in economics is also preferable in the study of religion; and fourth, the issue of religious pluralism and interfaith relations, arguing against the exclusivity produced by textualism and foundationalism in epistemology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR)؛ Methodological Pluralism؛ Foundationalism؛ Theory of Mind (TOM)؛ Natural Theology | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| فلسفه دین | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Cognitive Science and Philosophy of Religion: Embracing the Human Perspective | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Javad Darvish Aghajani | ||
| Assistant Professor, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is a relatively young field that explores the intersection between science and religion. Some argue that CSR, by employing purely explanatory methods and presupposing methodological naturalism, has materialized religion. Others believe that explanatory methods are not the sole approach in CSR, and the use of other methods is permissible. I aim to show how CSR has influenced the entire philosophy of religion. The paper examines various perspectives on the extent of CSR's influence on the philosophy of religion, particularly analyzing its effect on the proofs of natural theology. Contrary to the dominant literature, the impact of CSR can extend beyond merely strengthening or weakening theological arguments and can be used to argue for the reform of religious beliefs. This view is pursued from four different perspectives: first, the concept of God, arguing that weakening classic proofs does not imply weakening belief in God; second, the methodology of studying religion, advocating for methodological pluralism; third, the revelation and the role of humans in religion, suggesting that a behavioral shift desirable in economics is also preferable in religious studies; and fourth, religious pluralism and interfaith relations, arguing against the exclusivity produced by textualism and foundationalism. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Cognitive science of religion, explanatory pluralism, fundamentalism, natural theology, Alvin Plantinga | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alston, W. P. (1988). Religious diversity and perceptual knowledge of God. Faith and Philosophy, 5(4), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19885442
Alston, W. P. (2019). Divine nature and human language. In Divine nature and human language. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501733161
Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178036.001.0001
Barrett, J. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 768-786.
Barrett, J. (2008, June 18). Which cognitive revolution? https://tif.ssrc.org/2008/07/18/which-cognitive-revolution/ Barrett, J. (2011). Cognitive science, religion, and theology: from human minds to divine minds. Templeton Press.
Barrett, J. L. (2012). Born believers: The science of children’s religious belief. Atria Books. https://books.google.nl/books?id=CspnUR9Mx10C
Barth, K. (2010). Church dogmatics. In Church dogmatics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567690722 Benton, Ted., & Craib, Ian. (2001). Philosophy of social science: the philosophical foundations of social thought. In Traditions in social theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained. Basic Books.
Boyer, P. (2008). Religion explained. Random House. https://books.google.nl/books?id=O2yijB19N44C Buckareff, A., & Nagasawa, Y. (2016). Alternative concepts of God: Essays on the metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford University Press.
Clark, K., & Barrett, J. (2010). Reformed epistemology and cognitive science of religion. Faith and Philosophy, 174-189.
Craig, W. L., & Sinclair, J. D. (2009). The Kalam cosmological argument. In The Blackwell companion to natural theology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308334.ch3 Darvish A., J. (2022). A comparative study of cognitive science of religion and reformed epistemology. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2021.7115.2569
Darvish A., J., & Mousavi Karimi, M. (2017). On the continuity of Divine Grace: an empirical argument and a philosophical analysis. Philosophy of Religion Research, 15(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2017.1962 Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Bantam Press.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2015). A natural history of natural theology: The cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951-952. The MIT Press.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2017). Intuitions and arguments: Cognitive foundations of argumentation in natural theology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 9(2), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i2.1934
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin Books Limited. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=bn-isXoTZmUC
Draper, P., & Nichols, R. (2013). Diagnosing bias in philosophy of religion. Monist, 96(3), 420-446. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201396319
Horvat, S., & Roszak, P. (2020). Is religion only utilitarian? Evolutionary cognitive science of religion through a Thomistic lens. Theology and Science, 0(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786222
Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib. (2015). Nahj Al-Balagha (Peak of Eloquence) (Sharif al-Radi, Ed.; Vol. 2). Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an. Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. In Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440 Lawson, E. T. (2022). The historical Ggnesis of cognitive science of religion. In The Oxford handbook of the cognitive science of religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.1 Malley, B. (2022). Scripturalism: a theory. In J. L. Barrett (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the cognitive science of religion. Oxford University Press.
McNabb, T. D. (2018). Religious epistemology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108558365
Murphy, N. (2013). Naturalism and theism as competing traditions. How Successful Is Naturalism? 1957, 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328950.49
Nakissa, A. (2020). The cognitive science of religion and Islamic theology: an analysis based on the works of al-Ghazali. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 88(4), 1087-1120. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfaa059
Persinger, M. A. (2001). The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.4.515
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. In Warranted Christian belief. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195131932.001.0001
Sears, R. E. (2022). Conceiving religious dreams and mystical experiences. In The Oxford handbook of the cognitive science of religion (pp. 215-236). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.11
Shapiro, J. A. (2021). Why the third way of evolution is necessary. Theoretical Biology Forum, 114(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.19272/202111402002
Taylor, A., Roberts, R., Hunt, G., & Gray, R. (2009). Causal reasoning in New Caledonian crows. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.2.4.8224 Van Eyghen, H. (2022). CSR and religious belief: epistemic friends or foes? In The Oxford handbook of the cognitive science of religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.18 Visala, A. (2018). Pro-science rhetoric or a research program? – Naturalism(s) in the cognitive-evolutionary study of religion. In New approaches to the scientific study of religion (vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90239-5_4
Visala, A. (2022). Philosophical foundations of cognitive science of religion. In The Oxford handbook of the cognitive science of religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.2 White, C. (2021). An introduction to the cognitive science of religion: connecting evolution, brain, cognition, and culture. Routledge.
White, C., Marin, M., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2017). Not just dead meat: An evolutionary account of corpse treatment in mortuary rituals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 17(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342196 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 9,681 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 318 |
||