On the Concepts of Time, Space, Vacuum and Domain of Investigation among Contemporary Physics, Philosophy, and Theological Reflection | ||
| پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 26، شماره 1، فروردین 1403، صفحه 47-66 اصل مقاله (1.49 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2024.10113.2974 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Paolo Di Sia* | ||
| School of Science and School of Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. School of Medicine, Applied Technical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Contemporary theology is realizing the importance of integrating the knowledge of modern/contemporary physics into the metaphysical and ontological categories used to consider God and the God-world relationship. Time is a complex notion with different meanings, characterized by a plurality of uses. The concept of time opens up to broader conceptions than those of physics, mathematics, and philosophy and reveals that the human being, the earth, and the cosmos are not the center of space or time. The concepts of space, time, and matter, to which the concept of vacuum is connected, are of central importance in any modern physical theory, and particularly in the theories of unification. It is being discovered that spacetime is absent at the most fundamental level and only emerges at an appropriate limit. This emerging image of time leads to new conceptual challenges that must be faced in parallel with philosophy and theological research to achieve its correct understanding. It is a comparison of the viewpoints of the three investigative domains concerned with understanding the nature of consciousness, namely science, philosophy, and metaphysics. This thought process is connected to the intuitions of the contemplative and mystical traditions and seems to be in line with current scientific thought, which can be mathematically expressed. Recent scientific research struggles to grasp the subjective aspect of consciousness; subjective experience is in conflict with the figure of the observer classically understood in the scientific sense. The evolution of life and the relationship with the transcendent could have their information basis in a hyper-complex multi-dimensional space; recent efforts try to explain how mental states exist in the higher dimensions of this hyperspace; some recent models of unification integrate matter and consciousness through the use of this primordial multi-dimensional dynamic space. Ontological interpretations of quantum theory have been given, leading to patterns of bidirectional flow of consciousness between an explicate and an implicate order, supporting both local and non-local phenomena in the cosmos. The paper aims to offer an overview of the indicated issues with a trans-disciplinary method and through interesting hints for thought. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Time؛ Space؛ Vacuum؛ Science؛ Philosophy؛ Theology؛ Matter؛ Mind؛ Consciousness | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| فلسفه علم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| On the concepts of time, space, vacuum and domain of investigation among contemporary physics, philosophy and theological reflection | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Paolo Di Sia | ||
| School of Science and School of Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. School of Medicine, Applied Technical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Contemporary theology is realizing the importance of integrating the knowledge of modern/contemporary physics into the metaphysical and ontological categories used to consider God and the God-world relationship. Time is a complex notion with different meanings, characterized by a plurality of uses. The concept of time opens up to broader conceptions than those of physics, mathematics and philosophy and reveals that the human being, the earth and the cosmos are not the center of space or time. The concepts of space, time and matter, to which the concept of vacuum is connected, are of central importance in any modern physical theory, and particularly in the theories of unification. It is being discovered that spacetime is absent at the most fundamental level and only emerges at an appropriate limit. This emerging image of time leads to new conceptual challenges that must be faced in parallel with philosophy and theological research to achieve its correct understanding. It is a comparison of the viewpoints of the three investigative domains concerned with understanding the nature of consciousness, namely science, philosophy and metaphysics. This thought process is connected to the intuitions of the contemplative and mystical traditions | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| time, space, vacuum, science, philosophy, theology, matter, mind, consciousness | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aristotle. (2008). Physics. OUP Oxford.
Aspect, A. (1976). Proposed experiment to test the nonseparability of quantum mechanics. Physical Review D, 14, 1944. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.1944. Auletta, G. (2000). Foundations and interpretation of quantum mechanics, in the light of a critical-historical analysis of the problems and of a synthesis of the results. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/4194.
Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., & Mercati, F. (2014). Identification of a gravitational arrow of time. Physical Review Letters, 113, 181101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.181101. Bergson, H. (2019). Storia dell’idea di tempo [History of the idea of time]. (S. Guidi, Ed.). Mimesis.
Berryman, S. (2023). Democritus. (E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman, Eds.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/democritus/. Bohm, D. (2002). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
Boltzmann, L. (1999). Modelli matematici, fisica e filosofia. Scritti divulgativi [Models of mathematics, physics and philosophy. Popular writings]. Bollati Boringhieri.
Callender, C. (2013). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of time. Oxford University Press (reprint ed.).
Capek, M. (1962). Philosophical impact of contemporary physics. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’etranger, 152, 561-562.
Capra, F. (2010). The Tao of physics: an exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Shambhala Pubns.
Carroll, S. M., & Chen, J. (2004). Spontaneous inflation and the origin of the arrow of time. Preprint arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0410270.
Cosmic inflation. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/cosmic-inflation/. Di Sia, P. (2015). About the existence of the universe among speculative physics, metaphysics and theism: an interesting overview. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 50, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.50.36. Di Sia, P. (2018). Fisica moderna conscienza multiverso azione Divina – problemi, dubbi, convergenze [Modern physics, consciousness, multiverse, Divine action – problems, doubts, convergences]. Stamen (Series: the human and the Divine). https://www.ibs.it/fisica-moderna-coscienza-multiverso-azione-libro-paolo-di-sia/e/9788831928304?inventoryId=132142751. Di Sia, P. (2020a). On philosophy of mind, quantum physics and metaphysics of the uni-multiverse. Philosophical News, 18, 161-174. https://mimesisjournals.com/magazine_item_detail_front_phpnews.php?item_id=268. Di Sia, P., & Bhadra, N. K. (2020b). Everything in a part: about the creation of universe and consciousness. Ergonomics International Journal (EOIJ), 4(1), 000228 (6 pp), http://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000228. https://medwinpublishers.com/EOIJ/EOIJ16000228.pdf. Di Sia, P., & Bhadra, N. K. (2020c). Origin of consciousness and contemporary physics. World Scientific News, 140, 127-138. http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/WSN-140-2020-127-138.pdf. Di Sia, P. (2021a). Birth, development and applications of quantum physics: a transdisciplinary approach. World Scientific News, 160, 232-246. http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/WSN-160-2021-232-246.pdf. Di Sia, P. (2021b). On the concept of time in everyday life and between physics and mathematics. Ergonomics International Journal (EOIJ), 5(2), 000268 (8 pp). http://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000268. https://medwinpublishers.com/EOIJ/on-the-concept-of-time-in-everyday-life-and-between-physics-and-mathematics.pdf. Di Sia, P., & Bhadra, N. K. (2021c). About consciousness, subtle energies and unification. Ergonomics International Journal (EOIJ), 5(6), 000279 (4 pp), http://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000279. https://medwinpublishers.com/EOIJ/about-consciousness-subtle-energies-and-unification.pdf. Di Sia, P. (2021d). On advances of contemporary physics about totality. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME), 7(1), 8-12. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4642485.
Di Sia, P. (2021e). Interdisciplinary insights about the concept of time. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Education (IJSRME), 6(1), 14-16. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4727049.
Di Sia, P. (2023a). A commentary on “physical time within human time”. Timing & Time Perception, 1 (aop), 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10092. https://brill.com/view/journals/time/aop/article-10.1163-22134468-bja10092/article-10.1163-22134468-bja10092.xml. Di Sia, P. (2023b). Symmetry and the nanoscale: advances in analytical modeling in the perspective of holistic unification. Symmetry (MDPI), 15(8), 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081611. Dogmatic Constitution Dei Filius, chap. IV; DS 3015. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from: https://disf.org/dei-filius-vaticano-i.
Dowker, F. (2014). The birth of spacetime atoms as the passage of time. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1326(1) (Flow of Time), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12542. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
Einstein, A. (2014). Autobiografia scientifica [Scientific autobiography]. Bollati Boringhieri.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2014). The evolving block universe and the meshing together of times. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1326(1) (Flow of Time), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12559.
Ellis, G. F. R., & Silk, J. (2014). Scientific method: defend the integrity of physics. Nature, 516, 321-323. https://doi.org/10.1038/516321a.
Ellis, G. F. R., & Di Sia, P. (2023). Complexity theory in biology and technology: broken symmetries and emergence. Symmetry (MDPI), 15, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101945. Ferroni, L., & Taormina, D. P. (Eds). (2022). Plotinus IV 7(2) On the immortality of the soul: studies on the text and its sontexts. Academia Verlag.
Finkelstein, D., & Gibbs, J. M. (1993). Quantum relativity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, 1801-1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979502.
Giovanni, P. II. (2001). Varcare la soglia della speranza [Crossing the threshold of hope]. Mondadori.
Govinda, S. (1997). Coscienza cosmica. La realizzazione dell’assoluto [Cosmic consciousness. The realization of the absolute]. Edizioni Mediterranee.
Guitton, J. (1957). Arte di vivere e di pensare [Art of living and thinking]. San Paolo Edizioni.
Guitton, J. (1992). Dio e la scienza [God and science]. Bompiani.
Ismael, J. (2017). Passage, flow, and the logic of temporal perspectives. In C. Bouton, & P. Huneman (Eds.). Time of nature and the nature of time (326, 23-38), Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_2. Jauch, J. M. (1996). Sulla realtà dei quanti. Un dialogo galileiano [On quantum reality. A Galilean dialogue]. Adelphi.
Kingsley, K. S. & Parry, R. (2020). Empedocles. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). (E. N. Zalta, Ed.). Retrieved October 10, 2023, from: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/empedocles/>
Krauss, L. M. (2013). A universe from nothing: why there is something rather than nothing. Atria Publishing Group.
Larson, E. J., & Witham, L. (1999). Scientists and religion in America, Scientific American, 281(3), 88-93.
Lévinas, E. (1996). Dio, la morte e il tempo [God, death and time]. Jaca Book.
Mishra, A., Schramm, S., & Greiner, W. (2008). Kaons and antikaons in asymmetric nuclear matter. Physical Review C, 78, 024901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.024901. Planck, M. (1988). Wissenschaft und glaube – religion und naturwissenschaft [Science and faith – religion and natural science]. Union Verlag.
Plato. (2016). The timaeus of Plato. Hansebooks.
Pribram, K. H., & Carlton, E. H. (1986). Holonomic brain theory in imaging and object perception. Acta Psychologica, 63(2), 175-210. http://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(86)90062-4. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (2014). Tra il tempo e l’eternità [Between time and eternity]. Bollati Boringhieri.
Proctor, A. C. (2022). On time, causality, and the block universe. Clink Street Publishing.
Rideout, D. P., & Sorkin, R. D. (1999). Classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets. Physical Review D, 61, 024002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.024002. Sandage, A. (n.d.). A scientist reflects on religious belief. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from: https://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth15.html.
Aquinas, T. (1999). Summa theologiae. San Paolo Edizioni.
Savater, F. (2001). Le domande della vita [The questions of life]. Laterza.
Sbitnev, V. I. (2015). Physical vacuum is a special superfluid medium. InTech. http://doi.org/10.5772/59040. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/47567.
Smolin, L. (1999). The life of the cosmos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smolin, L. (2014). Time reborn: from the crisis in physics to the future of the universe. Penguin.
St. Augustine. (2021). The confessions of St. Augustine: Bishop of Hippo. (Ginger Classics, Ed.). Independently published.
Surhone, L. M., Timpledon, M. T., & Marseken, S. F. (Eds.). (2010). Sacred books of the East: Max Müller, Georg Bühler. Betascript Publishing.
Tegmark, M. (2003). Parallel universes. ArXiv:astro-ph/0302131v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0302131. Tipler, F. J. (2001). Die physik der unsterblichkeit: moderne kosmologie, Gott und die auferstehung der toten [The physics of immortality: modern cosmology, God and the resurrection of the dead]. Piper Taschenbuch.
Tosti, G. (2021). Io e tu. Il pensiero di Martin Buber [You and I. The thought of Martin Buber]. Studium.
Whitehead, A. N. (1947). Essays in science and philosophy. Philosophical Library.
Zero-point field. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/follow-up-what-is-the-zer/. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10,107 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 426 |
||