Ukraine Situation from the Perspective of International Criminal Law: ICC and Beyond | ||
| Iranian Journal of International and Comparative Law | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 41-54 اصل مقاله (550.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/ijicl.2023.9852.1075 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mousa Karami* 1؛ Reyhaneh Zandi1؛ Azar Givkey2 | ||
| 1Ph. D. Candidate in Public International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2Ph. D. in International Law and University Lecturer, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The ever-evolving landscape of International Criminal Law (ICL), as a field that connects different branches and levels of law, requires meticulous deliberation. Establishing international justice is a crucial step in ensuring that all perpetrators are held accountable. The International Criminal Court (ICC/the Court) has issued two arrest warrants against the President and Commissioner for Children’s Rights of the Russian Federation, on March 17, 2023, for their involvement in forced population transfer which is an international crime under the Rome Statute. This research article seeks to explore the Ukraine situation from the perspective of ICL and examine the arrest warrants issued by the ICC against Russian authorities. Additionally, it briefly addresses the Ukraine’s lawfare against Russia at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). While the issuance of the arrest warrants is in itself a positive step toward the fortification of international criminal justice, the implementation of these warrants specifically regarding the President of the Russian Federation seems to be very problematic. Nevertheless, in spite of the challenges faced by the ICC in this situation, issuance of the arrest warrants reveals a significant reality: international criminal justice does not exempt even the president of a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Furthermore, the legal actions taken by Ukraine against Russia at both the ICJ and ECtHR are legally positive steps towards halting aggression and restoring international peace and security through international law. However, these actions face challenges such as time constraints and compliance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Ukraine Situation؛ International Criminal Law؛ ICC؛ Arrest Warrant؛ ICJ؛ ECtHR | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Babaian S, The International Criminal Court – An International Criminal World Court? (Springer International Publishing AG 2018).
Cassese A, International Law (OUP 2005).
Cryer R, Robinson D, Vasiliev S, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure(3rd edn, CUP 2014).
Glasius M, The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement (Routledge 2007).
Klabbers J, International Law (CUP 2013).
Rezaie Nezhad I, The Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court (Majd Publication 2014) [In Persian].
Schabas W A, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (4th edn, CUP 2011).
Zol’ein P, The Foundations of Public International Law (6th edn, Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2009) [In Persian].
Akande D, ‘International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 98 The American Journal of International Law 407.
Akande D, ‘The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and Its Impact on Al Bashir’s Immunities’ (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice 333.
Azizi S, Karami M, ‘Applicability of Remedial Secession Theory on the Recognition of Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts' Independence’ (2023) 39 International Law Review 141 [In Persian].
Bonafe B I, ‘The Collective Dimension of Bilateral Litigation: The Ukraine v Russia Case before the ICJ’ (2022) 26 Questions of International Law 27.
Ekori A H, Masumbe P S, ‘Putin on Trial: Reality of Heads of State Immunity before International Criminal Courts’ (2022) 2 Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics 29.
Gill T D, ‘The Jus ad Bellum and Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine’ (2022) 25 Journal of International Peacekeeping 121.
Goldenziel J I, ‘An Alternative to Zombieing: Lawfare between Russia and Ukraine and the Future of International Law’ (2023) 108 Cornell Law Review Online 1.
Green J A, Henderson C, Ruys T, ‘Russia’s Attack on Ukraine and the Jus ad Bellum’ (2022) 9 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4.
Grzebyk P, ‘Escalation of the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 in Light of the Law on Use of Force and International Humanitarian Law’ (2022) XLI Polish Yearbook of International Law 145.
King H, ‘Immunities and Bilateral Immunity Agreements: Issues Arising from Articles 27 and 98 of the Rome Statute’ (2006) 4 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 269.
Kunz R, ‘Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts’ (2019) 30 European Journal of International Law 1129.
Martin J M, ‘The International Criminal Court: Defining Complementarity and Diving Implications for the United States’ (2006) 4 Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 107.
Ntanda Nsereko D D, ‘Triggering the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 4 African Human Rights Journal 256.
Zamani S G, ‘International Criminal Court and the Issue of Arrest Warrant against Omar Al Bashir’ (2009) 7 Legal Researches 13 [In Persian].
Abbasi S, ‘The Decision of the International Criminal Court in the Palestine Situation: A Beginning in the Prevention of Impunity for Israeli Crimes’ (2023) 4 Iranian Review for UN Studies 23.
Chapari M, Shayganfard M, ‘Criminal Responsibility in International Crimes and Its Contrast with the Discourse of Immunity’ (2017) 10 International Legal Researches 59 [In Persian].
Alter K J, ‘The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review’ in J L Dunoff and M A Pollack, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (1st edn, CUP 2013).
Saccucci A, ‘Interim Measures at the European Court of Human Rights: Current Practice and Future Challenges’ in F M Palombino, R Virzo and G Zarra (eds), Provisional Measures Issued by International Courts and Tribunals (Springer 2021).
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (last amended 2010) (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002) ISBN No. 92-9227-227-6.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980) UNTS, vol. 1155.
UNSC Resolution 1593 (2005) S/RES/1593 (2005).
ICJ, ‘Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (Ukraine v Russia)’ (25 February 2022); available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/182/182-20220227-WRI-01-00-EN.pdf (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICJ, ‘Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation: 32 States intervening) – Intervention’ (21 July 2022); available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/182/intervention (last accessed 18 August 2023).
Amnesty International UK, ‘Foreign Secretary: Help Deliver Justice for Ukraine’, available at: <www.amnesty.org.uk/actions/deliver-justice-ukraine> (last accessed 18 August 2023).
Council of Europe, ‘The Russian Federation is excluded from the Council of Europe’ (2022); available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/the-russian-federation-is-excluded-from-the-council-of-europe (last accessed 18 August 2023).
Crawford J, ‘Ukraine vs Russia: What the European Court of Human Rights Can (and Can’t) Do’ (7 April 2022), available at: https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/90187-ukraine-russia-european-court-of-human-rights-can-do.html (last accessed 5 May 2023).
ECHR, ‘The European Court grants urgent interim measures in application concerning Russian military operations on Ukrainian territory’ (2022); available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-7272764-9905947 (last accessed 18 August 2023).
Embassy of Ukraine, Declaration of acceptance of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/itemsDocuments/997/declarationRecognitionJuristiction09-04-2014.pdf (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICC, ‘Jurisdiction in the general situation- Situation referred to the ICC by 43 States Parties’ (2022); available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/situations/ukraine (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICC, ‘Statement by Prosecutor Karim A. A. Khan KC on the issuance of arrest warrants against President Vladimir Putin and Ms Maria Lvova-Belova’ (17 March 2023); available at: <www.icc-cpi.int> (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICC, ‘Statement of ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański, Public Affairs Unit, International Criminal Court’ (17 March 2023); available at: <www.icc-cpi.int> (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICC, ‘Statement of the Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, on the conclusion of the preliminary examination in the situation in Ukraine’ (11 December 2020); available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-prosecutor-fatou-bensouda-conclusion-preliminary-examination-situation-ukraine (last accessed 18 August 2023).
ICC, ‘Situation in Ukraine: ICC judges issue arrest warrants against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova’ (17 March 2023); available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and (last accessed 19 August 2023).
ICJ (International Court of Justice), ‘Rules of Court’ (adopted 14 April 1978 and entered into force 1 July 1978).
Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, ‘Declaration of acceptance of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ (8 September 2015); available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/iccdocs/other/Ukraine_Art_12-3_declaration_08092015.pdf#search=ukraine (last accessed 18 August 2023).
Steube A, ‘Voting Wrap-Up of the UN Security Council in 2022: Bitterness Mixed with Agreements’ (9 January 2023), available at: https://www.passblue.com/2023/01/09/voting-wrap-up-of-the-un-security-council-in-2022-bitterness-mixed-with-agreements/ (last accessed 5 May 2023). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 390 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 99 |
||