بررسی اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی | ||
| علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 9، شماره 3، مهر 1402، صفحه 469-503 اصل مقاله (3.7 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/stim.2023.8704.1876 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عباس قائدامینی هارونی* 1؛ مهرداد صادقی ده چشمه2؛ غلام رضا مالکی فارسانی3 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت فرهنگی، مدرس دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان | ||
| 2استادیار، عضو هیات علمی گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 3دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت فرهنگی، مدرس دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز هرند | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقهای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 استهدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقهای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 استهدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقهای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 است | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سرپرستی توهین آمیز؛ اشتراک گذاری دانش؛ پنهان سازی دانش؛ اخلاق کار اسلامی؛ دانشگاه دولتی؛ دانشگاه آزاد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abbas Ghaedamini Harouni1؛ Mehrdad Sadeghi de cheshmeh2؛ Ghulam Reza Maleki Farsani3 | ||
| 1PhD in Cultural Management, , lecturer at the Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences of Farsan Center | ||
| 2Associate of professor of management,Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 3PhD in Cultural Management, , lecturer at the Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences of Harand Center | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11 | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Abusive supervision, sharing knowledge, hiding knowledge, Islamic work ethic, State University, Azad University | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Quran. Abbas A. (2004). Scaling an Islamic Work Ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5): Agarwal, U.A. (2019). Examining links between abusive supervision, PsyCap, LMX and outcomes. Management Decision, 57(5): 1304-1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021103356 Ahmad, S. (2018). Can ethical leadership inhibit workplace bullying across East and West: exploring cross-cultural interactional justice as a mediating mechanism. European Management Journal, 36(2): 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.003 Ali, A. & Al-Kazemi, A. (2007). Islamic work ethic in Kuwait. Cross Culture Management: An International Journal, 14(2): 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600710745714 Ali, A.J. & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: a critical review. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1): 5-19. Ali, A.J. (1992). The islamic work ethic in arabia. Journal of Psychology, 126(5): 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543384 Anser, M.K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M.L.T. & Yousaf, Z. (2021). Ethicalleadership and knowledge hiding: an intervening and interactional analysis. Serv. Indust. J. 41: 307–329. Aryee, S., Sun, L.Y., Chen, Z.X.G. & Debrah, Y.A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 393-411. Ashfaq, S., Mahmood, Z. & Ahmad, M. (2013). Impact of Work-Life Conflict and Work over Load on Employee Performance in Banking Sector of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(5): 688-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.5.1754 Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffos, New Jersey. Bashir, M., Shabbir, R., Saleem, S., Abrar, M., Saqib, S. & Gill, S.H. (2020). Job-related and nonjob-related gossips among low-ranked employees in unionized service organization. Front. Psychol., 11: 994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00994 bin Salahudin, S.N., binti Baharuddin, S.S., Abdullah, M.S. & Osman, A. (2016). The effect of Islamic work ethics on organizational commitment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 130(35): 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00071-x Choi, W., Kim, S.L. & Yun, S. (2019). A social exchange perspective of abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: Investigating the moderating effects of psychological contract fulfillment and self-enhancement motive. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(3): 305–319. Connelly, C.E. & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal ofWork and Organizational Psychology, 24(3): 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325 Connelly, C.E., Zweig, D., Webster, J. & Trougakos, J.P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1): 64-88. Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6): 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602 Di Vaio, A., Hasan, S., Palladino, R., Profita, F. & Mejri, I. (2021). Understanding knowledge hiding in business organizations: a bibliometric analysis of research trends, 1988–2020. J. Busi. Res., 134: 560-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.040 Dollard, J., Miller, N.E., Doob, L.W., Mowrer, O.H. & Sears, R.R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Feng, J. & Wang, C. (2019). Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7): 1455-1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0737 Folger, R. & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: justice as accountability. In: Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1: 1-55. Ghani, U., Teo, T., Li, Y., Usman, M., Islam, Z.U., Gul, H., Naeem, R.M., Bahadar, H., Yuan, J. & Zhai, X. (2020). Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4): 1240. Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623 Groenewegen, S.A.M., Botke, J.A. & Kersten, A. (2020). De invloed van Abusief Werkgedrag op Knowledge Hiding van werknemers. Bachelor Thesis – Human Resource Studies. School of Social and Behavioral Science, Tilburg University. Gul, R.F., Dunnan, L., Jamil, K., Awan, F.H., Ali, B., Qaiser, A. & Aobin, Q. (2021). Abusive Supervision and Its Impact on Knowledge Hiding Behavior Among Sales Force. Front Psychol, 12: 800778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800778 Hamid, Z.A. (2011). Knowledge sharing in Islam: Implications for practice in organizations. In: Spirituality in Management from Islamic Perspectives. IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur: 155-190. Han, M.S., Masood, K., Cudjoe, D. & Wang, Y. (2021). Knowledge hiding asthe dark side of competitive psychological climate. Leadership Org. Dev. J. 42: 195–207. Han, S.H., Seo, G., Yoon, S.W. & Yoon, D.Y. (2016). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing: mediating roles of employee’s empowerment, commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(3): 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927426 Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W. & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with Abusive Supervision: The Neutralizing Effects of Ingratiation and Positive Effect on Negative Employee Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2): 264-280. Hassan, M.K., Miglietta, F., Paltrinieri, A. & Floreani, J. (2018). The effects of Shariah board composition on Islamic equity indices’ performance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(3): 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2021-0180. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural consequences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Islam, T., Ahmad, S., Kaleem, A. & Mahmood, K. (2021). Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: moderating roles of Islamic work ethic and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 59)2(: 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069 Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, F., Bouckenooghe, D. & Bashir, (2019). The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6): 810-819. Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, T., Bouckenooghe, D. & Bashir, F. (2019). The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6): 810-819. Javed, B., Bashir, S., Rawwas, M.Y. & Arjoon, S. (2017). Islamic work ethic, innovative work behaviour, and adaptive performance: the mediating mechanism and an interacting effect. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6): 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1171830 Jiang, W. & Gu, Q. (2016). How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity. Management Decision, 54(2): 455-475. Jones, D.A. (2009). A novel approach to business ethics training: improving moral reasoning in just a few weeks. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2): 367-379. Kalemci, R.A. & Tuzun, I.K. (2019). Understanding protestant and islamic work ethic studies: a content analysis of articles. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4): 999-1008. Khalid, M., Bashir, S., Khan, A.K. & Abbas, N. (2018). When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: an Islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(6): 794-806. Khan, K., Abbas, M., Gul, A. & Raja, U. (2015). Organizational justice and job outcomes: Moderating role of Islamic work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2): 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1937-2 Khan, S.N., Qureshi, I.M. & Ahmad, H.I. (2010). Abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes. European journal of social sciences, 15(4): 490-500. Khoreva, V. & Wechtler, H. (2020). Exploring the consequences of knowledgehiding: an agency theory perspective. J. Manag. Psychol., 35: 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0514 Kim, S.L., Kim, M. & Yun, S. (2015). Knowledge sharing, abusive supervision and support: a social exchange perspective. Group and Organization Management, 40(5): 599-624. Kim, S.L., Lee, S. & Yun, S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors: a conservation-of-resources perspective. Managerial Psychology, 31(6): 1106-1120. Kirrane, M., Kilroy, S. & O'Connor, C. (2019). The moderating effect of team psychological empowerment on the relationship between abusive supervision and engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0252 Krasikova, D.V., Green, S.G. & LeBreton, J.M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5): 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388 Kremer, H., Villamor, I. & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.010 Kumar Jha, J. & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. J. Knowl. Manag, 22: 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0048 Le, P.B. & Lei, H. (2018). The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3): 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0463 Lee, S., Kim, S.L. & Yun, S. (2017). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3): 403-413. Lian, H.W., Ferris, D.L. & Brown, D.J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1): 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003 Liu, D., Liao, H. & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5): 1187-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400 Liu, N.C. & Liu, M.S. (2011). Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior – an empirical study for taiwanese R&D professionals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4): 981-997. Liu, S., ZHU, Q. & Wei, F. (2019). How Abusive Supervision Affects Employees’ Unethical Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Examination of Turnover Intentions and Caring Climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21): 4187. Lyu, Y., Zhu, H., Zhong, H.J. & Hu, L. (2016). Abusive supervision and customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of hostile attribution bias and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality management, 53: 69-80. Ma, Z., Song, L. & Huang, J. (2022). How Peer Abusive Supervision Affects Sales Employees’ Customer Knowledge Hiding: The Roles of Rivalry and Schadenfreude. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 15: 1067-1083. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S359360 Martinko, M.J., Harvey, P., Brees, J.R. & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1): 120–137. Miminoshvili, M. & Cerne, M. (2022). Workplace inclusion–exclusion and knowledge-hiding behaviour of minority members. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., 20(3): 422-435. Mitchell, M.S. & Ambrose, M.L. (2007) .Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Applied Psychology, 92(4): 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159 Murtaza, G., Abbas, M., Raja, U., Roques, O., Khalid, A. & Mushtaq, R. (2016). Impact of Islamic work ethics on organizational citizenship behaviors and knowledge-sharing behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 133(2): 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2396-0 Nguyen, T.-M., Malik, A. & Budhwar, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding inorganizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership. J. Bus. Res., 139: 161–172. Peltokorpi, V. (2019). Abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion: the moderating role of power distance orientation and the mediating role of interaction avoidance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(3): 251-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12188 Peng, H. (2012). Counterproductive work behavior among Chinese knowledge workers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2): 119-138. Pradhan, S. & Jena, L.K. (2017). Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5): 825-838. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2017-1107 Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiplemediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5): 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237 Rafferty, A.E. & Restubog, S.L.D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviors: the hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2): 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x Ragab Rizk, R. (2008). Back to basics: an Islamic perspective on business and work ethics. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2): 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856992 Ruparel, N. & Choubisa, R. (2020). Knowledge hiding in organizations: a retrospective narrative review and the way rward. Slovenian academy of management, 9(1): 5-22. Serenko, A. & Bontis, N. (2016). Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6): 1199-1224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203 Singh, S.K. (2019). Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. J. Bus. Res., 97: 10–19. Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 434-443. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K.M. & Locke, E.A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1239-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478718 Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 178–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556375 Tepper, B.J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3): 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812 Tepper, B.J., Duffy, M.K., Henle, C.A. & Lambert, L.S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1): 101-123. Tepper, B.J., Duffy, M.K., Hoobler, J. & Ensley, M.D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455 Wang, S. & Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2): 115-131. Wu, T.-Y. (2008). Abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion: The mediating effects of subordinate justice perception and emotional labor. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 50(2): 201–221. Wu, W.L. & Lee, Y.C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1): 154-168. Xiao, M. & Cooke, F.L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in theworkplace is harmful: a review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour., 57: 470–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12198 Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C.K. & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of lmx. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4): 531–543. Yadav, M., Choudhary, S. & Jain, S. (2019). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing behavior in freelancers: a moderated mediation model with employee engagement and social support. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 12(2): 202-224. Yang, J., Lin, C., Fang, S. & Huang, C. (2019). An uncertainty management theory on the effects of abusive supervision. Management Decision, 57(11): 3079-3095. Yousef, D.A. (2000). Organizational commitment as of the relationship between Islamic work ethic and attitudes toward organizational change. Human Relations, 53(4): 513-537. Yousef, D.A. (2001). Islamic work ethic–A moderator between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in a cross-cultural context. Personnel review, 30(2): 152-169. Zahid, S.M. (2019). Impact of abusive supervision on project success: mediating role of knowledge hiding and moderating role of machiavellianism. Faculty of management & social sciences department of management sciences. Capital University of science and technology, Islamabad. Zweig, D. & Scott, K.A. (2018). Exploring Distrust, Paranoia, Knowledge Hiding and Abusive Supervision Over Time. Academy of Management, (1): 10312. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,399 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 994 |
||
