The Relation of Causal Necessity and Free Will in The Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence “When our pen reached this point, it shattered to pieces” | ||
| پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 89، مهر 1400، صفحه 113-136 اصل مقاله (1.8 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/jptr.2021.7671.2648 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محسن جوادی* | ||
| Professor of Philosophy, Department of Ethics, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The relation of causal necessity with free will has been a source of great debate in the history of philosophy and theology. However, in recent years, it has also been discussed in the science of Usul al-Fiqh. After explaining the compatibility of causal necessity with free will, Ākhūnd Khurāsānī speaks of the 'shattering of his pen.' Two interpretations have been given for this statement. Muḥaqqiq Iṣfahānī considers the theory of compatibility that Khurāsānī presented as being correct. However, he interprets the 'shattering of the pen' to be a reference to another matter, i.e., the problem of the recompense of an agent in the case where causal necessity is accepted. His explanation of the aforementioned compatibility and the permissibility of the recompense of sinners has been evaluated in this article. On the contrary, Muḥaqqiq Na'ini considers the 'shattering of the pen' to be a reference to the problem of the conflict between causal necessity and free will. He says that aside from the popular preliminaries of free will, such as knowledge and intention (which are the products of causal necessity), there is a need for something that he calls 'talab'-a noetic action that stems from the governance of the soul. He considers this talab to fall outside the scope of causal necessity. This paper seeks to examine the views of these two illustrious students of Ākhūnd Khurāsānī so that the various Usuli dimensions of this discussion can be clarified. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| free will؛ intention؛ desire؛ casual necessity؛ Muḥaqqiq Iṣfahānī؛ Muḥaqqiq Na'ini | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Relation of Causal Necessity and Free Will in The Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence “When our pen reached this point, it shattered to pieces” | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohsen Javadi | ||
| Professor of Philosophy, Department of Ethics, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The relation of causal necessity with free will has been a source of great debate in the history of philosophy and theology. However, in recent years, it has also been discussed in the science of Usul al-Fiqh. After explaining the compatibility of causal necessity with free will, Ākhūnd Khurāsānī speaks of the 'shattering of his pen.' Two interpretations have been given for this statement. Muḥaqqiq Iṣfahānī considers the theory of compatibility that Khurāsānī presented as being correct. However, he interprets the 'shattering of the pen' to be a reference to another matter, i.e., the problem of the recompense of an agent in the case where causal necessity is accepted. His explanation of the aforementioned compatibility and the permissibility of the recompense of sinners has been evaluated in this article. On the contrary, Muḥaqqiq Na'ini considers the 'shattering of the pen' to be a reference to the problem of the conflict between causal necessity and free will. He says that aside from the popular preliminaries of free will, such as knowledge and intention (which are the products of causal necessity), there is a need for something that he calls 'talab'-a noetic action that stems from the governance of the soul. He considers this talab to fall outside the scope of causal necessity. This paper seeks to examine the views of these two illustrious students of Ākhūnd Khurāsānī so that the various Usuli dimensions of this discussion can be clarified. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| free will, intention, desire, casual necessity, Muḥaqqiq Iṣfahānī, Muḥaqqiq Na'ini | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Hāshimī Shāhrūdī, M. (2012). Buḥūth fi ʿIlm al-ʿUṣūl, Taqrīrāt Shahīd Muḥammad Bāqir Ṣadr (vol.2). Qom: Muʾassisah Maʿārif Ahl al-Bayt.
Hilli, J. (2001). Tahzib al-Wuṣūl fi ʿIlm al-Uṣūl. London: Manshūrāt Imam Ali (a).
Avicena (Ibn Sina). (1393SH.). Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbihāt, vol.2. Qom: Nashr al-Balāgha. Iji, A. (1325 AH). Sharḥ al-Mawāqif, vol.8. Qom: Al-Sharif al-Rāzī.
Iṣfahānī, M. H. (2008). Nihāyat al-Dirāyah, (2nd ed.). Beirut: Muʾassisah Al Bayt (a) li al-Turāth.
Javadi, M. (1375SH). Dar Āmadi bar Khuda Shināsi-yi Falsafi. Qom: Ma’arif Umūr Asātid.
Kaḍimi, M. A. (1374 SH). Fawā’id al-Uṣūl. Qom: Muʾassisah al-Nashr al-Islāmiyyah. Khoie, A. (1388 SH). Ajwad al-Taqrīrāt, (2nd ed.). Qom: Muʾassisah Farhangi-yi Ṣāḥib al-Amr.
Khurāsānī, (1389SH). Kifāyat al-Uṣūl. Qom: Majma al-Fikr al-Islāmi.
Mīr Jāʿfarī Miyādihi, S. M. (1395SH). Jabr-i Falsafi az Dīdgah-i Ustad Fayyaḍi. Qom: Muʾassisah Imam Khomeini.
Morvārīd, M. (1384 SH). Nazariyyat-i Shayʾ Ingārane-yi Maʿna dar Falsafayi Taḥlīli wa ʿIlm-i Uṣūl. Naqd wa Nazar, 10 (39,40), 83-131.
Rāzī, F. (1987). Al-Maṭālib al-ʿAliya min al-ʿIlm al-Ilāhi, (vol.9). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabi. Rāzī, F. (1373SH). Sharḥ ʿUyūn al-Ḥikmat, (vol.3). Qom: Muʾassisah al-Ṣādiq
Rāzī, F. (1418AH). Al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿIlm al-Uṣūl, (vol.2). Qom: Muʾassisah al-Resāla.
Sabzawāri, H. (1999). Sharḥ Manẓūma-yi Hikmat, (vol.3). Tehran: Tehran University.
Sadr, M. B. (2009). Falsafatuna. Beirut: Dar al-Taʿārof.
Shīrāzi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (1981). Al-Ḥikmat al-Mutaʿālīa fī l-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyat al-ʿArbaʿa, [The Transcendent Theosophy in the Four Journeys of the Intellect], (2nd ed . Vols 1, 6). Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabi.
Ṭabāṭabāie, S. M. H. (1428). Nehāyat al-Ḥekma. vol.1. Qom: Moʾassisah Nashr Islami. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 861 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 657 |
||