Religious Epistemology and Dialectic | ||
| پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 21، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 81، مهر 1398، صفحه 43-58 اصل مقاله (4.85 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22091/pfk.2019.4085.2065 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hajj Muhammad Legenhausen* | ||
| استاد فلسفه ، مؤسسه آموزش و تحقیقات امام خمینی ، قم ، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Hajj Muhammad Legenhausen* Received: 20/02/2019 | Accepted: 15/04/2019 Much recent discussion of the epistemology of religious belief has focused on justification of belief in the existence of God. Religious belief, however, includes much more than belief in God. In this paper, it is argued that the justification of belief in God is best seen in the context of other interrelated religious beliefs and practices. Philosophers of religion argue about whether religious belief requires evidence and on the sorts of arguments that have been presented. In this paper, a dialectical approach to the justification of religious belief is suggested that draws upon Hegel, Peirce, and W. E. Hocking. Rational reflection on the nature of experience that provides the solution to the problems of skepticism and solipsism in the Hegelian tradition, a tradition self-consciously developed by both Peirce and Hocking. If reason itself is only manifest in social exchanges, then the rationality of religious belief cannot be a private affair restricted to the subject of experience; rather it is the process of communicative interactions in accord with the overlapping norms of those who participate in them. Finally, some implications of this approach for the problem of religious diversity are sketched. * Professor of Philosophy, The Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, Qom, Iran ׀ legenhausen@yahoo.com 🞕 Legenhausen, M. (2019). Religious Epistemology and Dialectic. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 43-58. doi: 10.22091/PFK.2019.4085.2065. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Religious epistemology؛ dialectic؛ religious belief؛ justification؛ Hegel؛ Charles Sanders Peirce؛ Hocking | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| فلسفه دین | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Religious Epistemology and Dialectic | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hajj Muhammad legenhausen | ||
| Professor of Philosophy, The Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Hajj Muhammad Legenhausen* Received: 20/02/2019 | Accepted: 15/04/2019 Much recent discussion of the epistemology of religious belief has focused on justification of belief in the existence of God. Religious belief, however, includes much more than belief in God. In this paper, it is argued that the justification of belief in God is best seen in the context of other interrelated religious beliefs and practices. Philosophers of religion argue about whether religious belief requires evidence and on the sorts of arguments that have been presented. In this paper, a dialectical approach to the justification of religious belief is suggested that draws upon Hegel, Peirce, and W. E. Hocking. Rational reflection on the nature of experience that provides the solution to the problems of skepticism and solipsism in the Hegelian tradition, a tradition self-consciously developed by both Peirce and Hocking. If reason itself is only manifest in social exchanges, then the rationality of religious belief cannot be a private affair restricted to the subject of experience; rather it is the process of communicative interactions in accord with the overlapping norms of those who participate in them. Finally, some implications of this approach for the problem of religious diversity are sketched. * Professor of Philosophy, The Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, Qom, Iran ׀ legenhausen@yahoo.com 🞕 Legenhausen, M. (2019). Religious Epistemology and Dialectic. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 43-58. doi: 10.22091/PFK.2019.4085.2065. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Religious epistemology, dialectic, religious belief, justification, Hegel, Charles Sanders Peirce, Hocking | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References - Alston, W. P. (1982). Religious Experience and Religious Belief. Noûs, 16(1), 3-12. doi: 10.2307/2215404 - Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God. Ithaca: Cornell. - Beiser, F. C. (Ed.). (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel (Reprint Edition edition). Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press. - Beiser. F. C. (2005). Hegel. New York: Routledge. - Blackstone. W. T. (1963). The Problem of Religious Knowledge. The Impact of Contemporary Philosophical Analysis on the Question of Religious Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. - Calton, P. M. (2001). Hegel’s Metaphysics of God. Aldershot: Ashgate. - Craig. W. L. (1979). The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan. - Flew, A. & Macintyre, A. (1955). New Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Macmillan. - Hick, J. (1957). Faith and knowledge: a modern introduction to the problem of religious knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell. - Hocking, W. E. (1959). Types of philosophy, (3rd edition). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. - Hocking. W. E. (1912). The Meaning of God in Human Experience: A Philosophic Study of Religion. New Haven: Yale; and Whitefish. MT: Kessinger Publications. 2003. - Kanzian, C., & Legenhausen, M. (Eds.). (2010). Soul: A Comparative Approach. Frankfurt, M.: Ontos Verlag. - Lauer, Q. (1982). Hegel’s Concept of God. Albany: State University of New York Press. - Legenhausen. M. (2009). William E. Hocking on Religious Experience. in Majmu‘eh-ye maqalat bargozideh-ye hamayesh-e ‘irfan. tajrobeh-ye dini va goft-e gu-ye adiyan (Anthology of selected articles of the conference on mysticism. religious experience. and religious dialogue). Ed. N. Gharavi Na’ini. (Tehran: Tarbiyat Modarres. 1388). 147-184. - Löffler, W. (2006). Einführung in die Religionsphilosophie. Darmstadt: WBG. - McTaggart, J. M. E. (1922). Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic. Kitchner: Batoche Books. 1996. - Misbah Yazdi. M. T. (2010). Two Problems in the Theory of Substantial Motion. in Kanzian, C., & Legenhausen, M. (Eds.). Soul: A Comparative Approach. Frankfurt, M.: Ontos Verlag. 175-185. - Mitchell, Basil. (1973). The Justification of Religious Belief. London: Macmillan. - Plantinga, A. (1967). God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Ithaca: Cornell. - Plato. (1997). Plato: Complete Works (J. M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson, Eds.). Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Publishing Co. - Rescher, N. (2006). Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press. - Sanders, A. F. & de Ridder, K. (2007). Fifty Years of Philosophy of Religion: A Select Bibliography. (1955-2005). Leiden and Boston: Brill. - Smith, J. E. (1995). Experience and God. New York: Fordham University Press.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 947 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 729 |
||